Since the 9k-series is capable of 250k triggers/s in segmented memory mode, I guess it must be be graphics that's the bottleneck for the update rate. The user's manual states that the display is updated for every trigger in real time mode, which of course severly limits the capture rate.
This is in contrast to the x/6k/7k-series where, if I get it right, the acquired data is preprocessed and reduced in the Megazoom asic before transfer to the graphics processor at a much lower rate than the trigger rate.
My guess is that they only upgraded the front end, not the graphics data processing on the 9000H (compared to the std 9k-series). But that's not much of an excuse for such low update rate in a new scope. Maybe it's enough for marketing point of view.
free_electron, are you certain that the Megazoom (III?) asic is used in the 9000k-series? It would make sense since the 9k came after the 6k/7k models (if I remember correctly). But obviously there's some fundamental difference in how they put the rest together...