| Products > Test Equipment |
| New bench scope - Fnirsi 1014D, 7", 1GSa/s |
| << < (64/67) > >> |
| thomasx:
My impression is that any entry level Rigol or Siglent is way better than this, at more or less the same cost, and way better value for money. |
| csuhi17:
Even a Hantek is better than this... |
| Aldo22:
--- Quote from: csuhi17 on April 06, 2024, 10:08:51 am ---Even a Hantek is better than this... --- End quote --- I had also looked at this Fnirsi 1014D and found the 50mV/div disturbing and therefore did not pursue it any further. With the Hantek DSO2C10 I can still measure frequencies at e.g. 230µV RMS (attachment). If I see things correctly, the Fnirsi can't even dream of that. The Hantek certainly does not reach the quality of Rigol or Siglent, but they are more expensive. For the same price as this Fnirsi (I bought the Hantek for $130) it is much more powerful, I think. |
| csuhi17:
--- Quote from: Aldo22 on April 06, 2024, 11:30:03 am ---I had also looked at this Fnirsi 1014D and found the 50mV/div disturbing and therefore did not pursue it any further. With the Hantek DSO2C10 I can still measure frequencies at e.g. 230µV RMS (attachment). If I see things correctly, the Fnirsi can't even dream of that. The Hantek certainly does not reach the quality of Rigol or Siglent, but they are more expensive. For the same price as this Fnirsi (I bought the Hantek for $130) it is much more powerful, I think. --- End quote --- As far as I know, the 10x position of the probe is 50mV. 5mV in 1x position. Yes, that's why I recommended Hantek to several people, but it turned out afterwards that it has a lot of bugs, I don't have such a scope and I didn't really look into it, so I don't know exactly what they're complaining about. |
| Aldo22:
--- Quote from: csuhi17 on April 06, 2024, 12:44:33 pm ---As far as I know, the 10x position of the probe is 50mV. 5mV in 1x position. --- End quote --- I don't think so. It is the official specification. Why would they write 50mV when it's 5mV? That would be a marketing disaster. --- Quote from: csuhi17 on April 06, 2024, 12:44:33 pm ---Yes, that's why I recommended Hantek to several people, but it turned out afterwards that it has a lot of bugs, I don't have such a scope and I didn't really look into it, so I don't know exactly what they're complaining about. --- End quote --- I have a Hantek and it's good enough for me so far. After the last FW update a month ago, I haven't had a single crash. The trick with the Hantek is to be careful not to pay too much for it. Unfortunately the prices vary a lot. For example, Hantek France sells them for €347 VAT included. You shouldn't pay that much! That is ridiculous. :scared: I wouldn't pay much more than $150 for a DSO2C10 and I would only recommend the DSO2C10, because the more expensive versions are all technically the same afaik. But for the comparable price, it's imo generally a better tool than the Fnirsi 1014D. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |