Products > Test Equipment
New Hantek DSO2X1X models?
nokin:
Yes I did and used Hantek for 9 months before gave it for my friend.
I tried the optimum and steady clock for Cpu and Ram but basically Hantek uses cpu for calculating and drawing waveform so it must be lagged.
If you use Hantek for "static" waveform it is ok but "dynamic" like analog audio monitoring or calibrating (tape deck azimuth and phase, recording bias...) its not real-time display, delay about 0.5s. The more measuring display on screen the more laggy scope does. Quite annoying.
Then I switched to Rigol Ds1102z-e and now Siglent Sds1202x-e. $100 extra but definitely better. Waveform displayed look like analog scope, both trace and speed.
Aldo22:
--- Quote from: nokin on November 14, 2023, 06:30:50 am ---Then I switched to Rigol Ds1102z-e and now Siglent Sds1202x-e. $100 extra but definitely better.
--- End quote ---
It depends very much on where you live.
Here the RIGOL DS1102Z-E costs about 320 CHF, the Siglent SDS1202X-E (imported by post, there is no distributor here) about 385 CHF.
That's quite a difference compared to the 124 CHF for the Hantek DSO2C10.
I see it as the next step. I'm sure I can learn and experiment a lot with the Hantek.
When I'm "done with it", I might buy a Rigol, but then a better one, with 4 channels etc. We'll see.
tautech:
--- Quote from: nokin on November 14, 2023, 06:30:50 am ---Then I switched to Rigol Ds1102z-e and now Siglent Sds1202x-e. $100 extra but definitely better.
--- End quote ---
So the SDS1102C > SDS1102X-E > SDS1202X-E product ID and BW hacks all worked ?
nokin:
--- Quote from: tautech on November 14, 2023, 07:14:20 am ---So the SDS1102C > SDS1102X-E > SDS1202X-E product ID and BW hacks all worked ?
--- End quote ---
;D Im in the middle now ... SDS1102X-E. I will test "SCOPE_ID?" soon as your hint.
Anyway I like "E" than "C" despite of its just a sufix.
Of course I know C is never becomes E, it lack of ERES menu and half of capture rate but I see Siglent 1102X-E is more responsive than Rigol DS1102Z-E. It is much faster in UI, capture rate, better noise front end, layout in front plate...
nokin:
--- Quote from: Aldo22 on November 14, 2023, 07:12:31 am ---
It depends very much on where you live.
When I'm "done with it", I might buy a Rigol, but then a better one, with 4 channels etc. We'll see.
--- End quote ---
I completely agree ...
Especially now you are living in Switzerland now, the heaven on the Earth, so I wonder why you don't take a look at Siglent or Rigol even Rohde & Schwarz or so on instead of Hantek. I'm just joke ;D
Hantek is good, maybe best p/p but it suite for student or amatuer user.
I see that the measuring result from Hantek is not reliable.
When it gives results I am always skeptical... is this (waveform) right?
I use scope for calibration analog audio equipment, especially bias mixed with signal. Hantek showed me laggy and ugly waveform, noise, bad trigger (for complex signal)
I just want to share my experience, I'm not talking bad about Hantek here.
It depends on your needs and how you use the device.
Anyway thanks David Alfa for your support and all usefull modding/hacking tips/tools.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version