Products > Test Equipment

New Rigol DS1054Z oscilloscope

<< < (900/966) > >>

BravoV:

--- Quote from: bd139 on September 11, 2019, 07:22:20 am ---On age degradation the only thing that worries me is the crappy feet. They feel like they’re going to die first.

--- End quote ---

Ditto, every times I lift it to pull both front feet, had the feeling that one day the plastic will rot and becoming so brittle, and finally snapped.

borjam:

--- Quote from: StillTrying on September 11, 2019, 12:06:15 am ---
--- Quote from: David Hess on August 06, 2019, 11:00:30 pm ---The problem cannot be interpolation when there is nothing to interpolate.  1 GS/s on the Rigol is a point every nanosecond so unless the Rigol is mangling the original sample points, there should be no problem.

--- End quote ---

There's often mentions around here that the rigol's displayed 'dots' are interpolated, I dunno meself.
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/rigol-ds1054z-vs-siglent-sds1202x-e/msg2483973/#msg2483973

--- End quote ---

Yes. At least in my opinion it's a bit confusing.

Fungus:

--- Quote from: David Hess on August 06, 2019, 11:00:30 pm ---
--- Quote from: t_i_t_o on August 06, 2019, 07:50:22 am ---Just to put some oil in the fire, here is the same signal, same Tek probe, but seen with 1.5GHz 8GS/s HP infinium. So compared to the rigol, we see a peak at the beginning of each pulse, where this peak is observed i.e. after the front. On rigol is at the end of the pulse - before the front. Any explanation? Bad interpolation?
--- End quote ---

The problem cannot be interpolation when there is nothing to interpolate.  1 GS/s on the Rigol is a point every nanosecond so unless the Rigol is mangling the original sample points, there should be no problem.

--- End quote ---

Even if it was mangling the points you'd only notice the mangling with more than two channels on. The difference would be close to zero at 1GS/s.

MatthewTx:
Are the buttons nice hard plastic, or are they rubbery and soft? I can't tell from pictures and reviews I've seen online.
Seems like an obscure piece of data, yet easy for anyone (who owns one) to provide.

Thanks,

Matthew

Martin72:
Hi,

rubbery and soft... ;)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod