| Products > Test Equipment |
| New Rigol DS7000 |
| << < (29/72) > >> |
| pascal_sweden:
Maybe the anti-glare filters from 3M can help here: https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/company-us/all-3m-products/~/All-3M-Products/Privacy-Screen-Protectors/Protection-Products/Anti-Glare/?N=5002385+8710873+8711017+8725355+8725357+3294857497&rt=r3 |
| 2N3055:
Absolutely they could... And they should come already laminated on screen from factory.... |
| pascal_sweden:
Anybody in touch here with senior management from Rigol? Please make them talk to 3M management for a good bulk rate on factory mounted anti-glare filters! :) |
| bugi:
--- Quote from: 2N3055 on August 06, 2018, 11:00:21 am ---Glossy screens are crap. There is no option where they are better that matte... Glossy is cheap multimedia crap that is so ubiquitous because tablets use them. Which would be so much better with matte screens too. And matte screens show less smudges from fingerprints ... I guess it needs additional cost to make matte screen and apply anti reflective coating. --- End quote --- Uh, my experience so far has been such that matte screens are a nightmare to clean from fingerprints (or any smudges) and the fingerprints show up just as well as on glossy (until you try to wipe them off; glossy gets clean in single wipe, matte just gets worse and needs microfiber and soap water and still needs half a minute of gentle wiping). All the way to the point of getting permanent marks on my anti-reflection coating of one of my displays, because it seems impossible to get whatever crap ended up in the microscopic pits... Also, most matte surfaces are, afaik, based on some form of plastic/non-hard material, which means that if you use it as a touchscreen, it will not be nice even matte for long (e.g. the most used spots on a matte-surfaced keyboards get glossy in less than couple years, and the spots that get hit by fingernails much faster). There must be a reason why majority of touchscreens are glossy, even on the most expensive high end devices, which could (and would) use more expensive choices. Best examples are some expensive laptop models which offered both touch and non-touch display versions; the touch ones were always glossy, non-touch ones had always anti-reflection. For non-touch displays I always choose some anti-reflection stuff, but touch ones... until they can figure out a type that can last years without getting wear marks and a method to clean them properly, glossy it is for me. |
| nctnico:
I have two touch screen scopes with glossy screens and it really is not an issue at all. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |