Products > Test Equipment

New Rigol DS7000

<< < (61/72) > >>

drhex:
Thanks @memeruiz, this worked like a charm!

mindcrime:
Awesome, now I just need to go back through this entire thread, re-read it all, really digest / understand what's going on here, and then I can take a stab at hacking my MSO70204.  ;D

I'm hoping it goes more smoothly, since I get the benefit of learning from the pains you guys have had already!  :-+

drhex:
And managed to brick the scope. Somehow it didn't persist settings through reboot, so tried to install the latest from the website (v00.01.02.00.06), no change. The patched appEntry from v01.01.02.00.06 doesn't work with that, patching it with the same patch bricks the scope - ssh doesn't come up when it gets stuck at appEntry, at least for me. Now I can't reinstall from the bootloader after pressing "single" on power on, says the package is invalid? Doesn't seem to use the USB really, at least not for an extended time before complaining about the package. Does anybody have an idea?

drhex:
OK, not being able to reinstall from the hidden menue was apparently due to a too big USB stick, a 2GB one worked fine in the end. Does anybody have the v01.01.02.00.06 install file?
Patch for v00.01.02.00.06 attached, please use bspatch to apply.

memeruiz:

--- Quote from: drhex on May 02, 2021, 10:25:35 pm ---OK, not being able to reinstall from the hidden menue was apparently due to a too big USB stick, a 2GB one worked fine in the end. Does anybody have the v01.01.02.00.06 install file?
Patch for v00.01.02.00.06 attached, please use bsdiff to apply.

--- End quote ---

Awesome @drhex that you could get your scope working again and upgraded.

I'm at a loss with my scope firmware version. It is not on any website for downloading. Apparently is newer than all the downloadable ones.

When you applied bspatch, did the patching gave any errors or warnings? (Like patch not applied or failed)

The last binary data chunk is tricky. I think the binary asm instruction may change from firmware to firmware because it is a branch execution and the branch address is different. (This is what I noticed comparing with the 5k). Not sure really.

I hope this doesn't mean a different binary patch is necessary for each version.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod