Products > Test Equipment
New Scope Demoboard from Batronix
<< < (61/65) > >>
blurpy:
I know that I'm being a bit annoying here (sorry). I just find the use of "learning ability" as a reason for not implementing a feature to be a bit provoking.

It's fair to prioritize based on how many find something valuable, which is probably why ascii is missing for parallel signals.
ebastler:

--- Quote from: blurpy on April 07, 2024, 11:02:27 am ---
--- Quote from: ebastler on April 07, 2024, 10:49:15 am ---For example, how about enabling pattern "trigger" for the Search function? That would enable us to capture and decode a long data sequence from a parallel bus including its handhake signals, then look for particular situations (patterns) on those lines and highlight them via search markers.

--- End quote ---
Well you would learn much more by not having this feature I think :)

--- End quote ---

I was serious about this proposal. How would you currently deal with a data bus which addresses various devices, where you want to review all (!) write accesses to one particular device? You can trigger on the desired combination of R/W and CS states, but then you will miss a lot of accesses during trigger re-arming gaps. But you cannot search for this combination of states in a longer capture.

Not sure how serious you are about the pain level caused by the lack of ASCII decoding.  ::)
I never talked about "learning ability", by the way; not sure where you got that itch from.
Martin72:
Discussing the sense or not of a possible feature for siglent scopes would make more sense in one of the siglent feature threads.
ebastler:

--- Quote from: Martin72 on April 07, 2024, 11:24:44 am ---Discussing the sense or not of a possible feature for siglent scopes would make more sense in one of the siglent feature threads.

--- End quote ---

I agree, and will propose the pattern search in the SDS800X HD feature request thread. I was just trying to discourage the request for a particular Siglent feature (parallel ASCII decoding) based on a "need" which is caused by Batronix' choice of a demo gimmick.
2N3055:

--- Quote from: 2N3055 on February 15, 2024, 09:16:10 pm ---It is faster than that...

Estimate cca. 270-280ps ...

Measuring 480ps on scope with 400ps risetime. 500ps on scope with with 420ps risetime and 521ps on one with 440ps risetime..

Used good quality 200mm cable.

--- End quote ---


Hehe don't you just love it when math works...

Built in clock source on board is extremely jittery ...
So I did a bit of creative thinking and disconnected fast logic gate (pulled the jumper so it does not get signal) and in jumper connected external signal from AWG. I fed it 100MHz.

Not only that little gate on Batronix board works just nice with 100Mhz clock, the rise/fall times are exactly where I calculated they would be... ^-^

Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod