Author Topic: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs  (Read 23948 times)

BillyO, Fungus, Performa01 and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mechatrommer

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11653
  • Country: my
  • reassessing directives...
Re: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs
« Reply #500 on: Today at 10:53:50 am »
this is +1 imho in rigol, lets not forget, the 2 scopes discussed here got pros and cons.
Since the Siglent can into 2 Gsa/s, it could potentially be modded to support at least 800 MHz single-channel bandwidth, if there are no further limitations in digital signal processing and/or software. I don't recall anyone mentioning or trying this though.
i posted this earlier in this thread, some people said its very rare case. now we have 2 person asking for it ;) so i'm not so rare, lets wait HAM fellows (names with numbers and who build their own radio) to chime in what they have to say, cheers.
Nature: Evolution and the Illusion of Randomness (Stephen L. Talbott): Its now indisputable that... organisms “expertise” contextualizes its genome, and its nonsense to say that these powers are under the control of the genome being contextualized - Barbara McClintock
 

Offline gf

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1183
  • Country: de
Re: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs
« Reply #501 on: Today at 11:00:55 am »
The Rigol is applying the theory correctly and the Siglent can't possibly be doing an infinitely wide reconstruction, so...  :-//

But you have the choice to implement either
  • a truncated/windowed sinc filter with a n*sampe_rate...(1-n)*sample_rate transition band (symmetrical around 0.5*sample_rate),
  • or an ordinary steep lowpass filter with a n*sampe_rate...0.5*sample_rate transition band,
where 0<n<0.5 (for example n=0.4).

Contrary to what you might intuitively believe, it's the latter which does what people here seem to expect when it comes to frequencies beyond the filter's reconstructability limit of n*sample_rate. But it requires more DSP resources.
 

Online pdenisowski

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 638
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs
« Reply #502 on: Today at 02:14:07 pm »
lets wait HAM fellows (names with numbers and who build their own radio) to chime in what they have to say

Depends on the kind of radio you're building (or operating) :)  In the United States, there are amateur allocations at 902 MHz and 1240 MHz, and some experimenters go even higher.

https://www.arrl.org/files/file/Regulatory/Band%20Chart/Band%20Chart%20-%2011X17%20Color.pdf

One of my commercially-produced radios (the Icom 9700) has 144, 440, and 1200 MHz,  Icom is also investigating making amateur transceivers for the 2.4 and 5.6 GHz ISM bands

https://www.icomjapan.com/api/download.php?page_id=66&fl=JTJGdXBsb2FkcyUyRmxwJTJGc2hmJTJGU0hGX3Byb2plY3Rfdm9sMV9lbmcucGRm

73, Paul, KO4LZ
Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 

Offline Mechatrommer

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11653
  • Country: my
  • reassessing directives...
Re: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs
« Reply #503 on: Today at 02:58:39 pm »
nice story but anything 1GHz and above is not relating to this thread... 140,144,902MHz maybe related. if you have one of this https://www.ebay.com.my/itm/114448357711 it would be nice to see the signal in time domain... ymmv.
Nature: Evolution and the Illusion of Randomness (Stephen L. Talbott): Its now indisputable that... organisms “expertise” contextualizes its genome, and its nonsense to say that these powers are under the control of the genome being contextualized - Barbara McClintock
 

Online Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16679
  • Country: 00
Re: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs
« Reply #504 on: Today at 03:52:26 pm »
iircsomeone stated dho800 only works on specific brand. i have few wifi adapter here, maybe later i will try. but still, its a few more steps to do... rather than plugin usb stick and hit capture button. ymmv.

It's literally the most common chipset/brand.

I never take the WiFi dongle out. Apart from the web interface you can save all screen captures, data dumps, etc., to the internal memory and accessed via ftp as if they were local files on my PC.

You also get correct date/time stamps on the files if it's connected to WiFi.
« Last Edit: Today at 03:56:02 pm by Fungus »
 
The following users thanked this post: Mechatrommer

Online KungFuJosh

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1558
  • Country: us
  • TEAS is real.
Re: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs
« Reply #505 on: Today at 04:48:54 pm »
@KungFuJosh can you please set the scope to 500 Msa/s, low waveform acquisition rate (to make the TinySA's glitches less visible), low persistence, and record a video of a 30 seconds long frequency sweep from, say, 110 MHz to 270 MHz?

Coax connection with a 50 Ohm feed-through terminator, if possible, to make the test conditions the same as in my test.

It will be interesting to see at what frequencies (and at what ratio relative to the sampling rate) it will become first wobbly and then AM-like (if it will), to compare that to Rigol.

I'd love to play, but I don't have one of these scopes. I have an SDS2504X+ 500MHz scope. I can sweep up to 841MHz on my scope with the TinySA Ultra.
"I installed a skylight in my apartment yesterday... The people who live above me are furious." - Steven Wright
 

Online shapirus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1363
  • Country: ua
Re: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs
« Reply #506 on: Today at 05:00:33 pm »
I'd love to play, but I don't have one of these scopes. I have an SDS2504X+ 500MHz scope.
Well, it would still be an interesting data point. What's the lowest samples/sec rate it can do? The idea is to set it to the lowest sampling rate and connect it to a source that outputs a frequency sweep in the range from ~20% to ~60% of the sampling rate.

We can then speculate if the Siglent's 800 HD series have the same wave reconstruction implementation as yours, or not :).

I can sweep up to 841MHz on my scope with the TinySA Ultra.
It can actually output up to 5.4 GHz (or at least so the specs say), but it switches from sine to square wave above 800 MHz.
« Last Edit: Today at 05:02:04 pm by shapirus »
 

Online Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16679
  • Country: 00
Re: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs
« Reply #507 on: Today at 05:46:40 pm »
I'd like to know what the Siglent does on a real AM waveform, too.

Feed in the 220MHz signal at 500MSamples/sec. but add some AM modulation and see if it reproduces it (eg. 16MHz modulator).
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf