| Products > Test Equipment |
| Old Fluke Multimeters |
| << < (102/192) > >> |
| 001:
--- Quote from: frozenfrogz on September 11, 2018, 09:46:34 am ---I would not use the 8010A for daily use though if I had to make a living on it - not because of accuracy concerns but because of legibility and working speed. (One day I will have the time to do a proper LED conversion...) --- End quote --- I.e. You need only mains powered device with big LED digits, isnt it? You sad about working speed What do You mean since 8010A is manual range meter? Thanx |
| bd139:
8010A is slow to settle on a reading. Only marginally slower than my U1241C though >:( |
| 001:
This speed depends of input "integral" capasitor at this specific ADC see 7106 chip appnote may be some leakage etc |
| GregDunn:
--- Quote from: med6753 on September 30, 2017, 04:35:10 pm ---Seems old Fluke bench multimeters are somewhat under represented in this thread so let me contribute. Top to bottom: 8600A 8000A 8010A 8050A And just peeking in lower left... 8021A 1st generation 87. --- End quote --- I'm really happy with my 8600A which I picked up from the same seller as the HP6236B at a hamfest. I wouldn't mind having another, or even an 8800A; it seems stable and accurate, and I can read it from a mile away even in high ambient light. While it might annoy some people, I actually like the loud relay click when it switches ranges; it alerts me that something has changed, even if I'm not looking at the meter. |
| frozenfrogz:
--- Quote from: 001 on September 11, 2018, 10:17:21 am ---You sad about working speed What do You mean since 8010A is manual range meter? --- End quote --- I was not pointing to something specific, just overall convenience and speed because of general ease of reading the display or not having to switch ranges etc. It clearly depends on a lot of personal preferences. Active LED display or a decent back light would make the 8010A much more convenient to use. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |