| Products > Test Equipment |
| Open source lxi-tools and liblxi v1.0 released for GNU/Linux |
| << < (39/67) > >> |
| Dwaine:
That worked great. I had to change the Makefile.in for the fedora qmake-qt5. It was defaulting to qmake. The GUI is really nice. Worked great with my Rigol scope. Testing out the graphing with my DM3068. |
| lundmar:
--- Quote from: Dwaine on January 29, 2018, 12:15:12 am ---That worked great. I had to change the Makefile.in for the fedora qmake-qt5. It was defaulting to qmake. The GUI is really nice. Worked great with my Rigol scope. Testing out the graphing with my DM3068. --- End quote --- Great, and thanks :-+ I'm pretty happy with the general design of the GUI - I hope we can keep this simple layout even as more features are added in the future. FYI - the issue with calling the correct qmake should be resolved in latest git (it is now calling QT5 qmake indirectly via the qtchooser tool). |
| ralphrmartin:
Lundmar Just a quick comment - the GUI is a little inflexible for small screens. I am running all this on a MacBook Air (under VirtualBox) which gives me an effective screen height of just over 700 pixels. As a result, the bottom of the window is cut off, and there is no scroll bar etc to make it visible. Is there any simple way to make the window a bit more friendly to smaller screens? Thanks for all the good work on this! Ralph |
| lundmar:
--- Quote from: ralphrmartin on January 30, 2018, 10:42:28 am ---Lundmar Just a quick comment - the GUI is a little inflexible for small screens. I am running all this on a MacBook Air (under VirtualBox) which gives me an effective screen height of just over 700 pixels. As a result, the bottom of the window is cut off, and there is no scroll bar etc to make it visible. Is there any simple way to make the window a bit more friendly to smaller screens? Thanks for all the good work on this! Ralph --- End quote --- Hmm, isn't mac supposed to have them fancy high resolution Retina displays? ;) I've reduced the minimum window size to 700x600 so I assume you can fit it now. |
| lundmar:
I had to go back and update the benchmark performance numbers for the Siglent SDS1204X-E because it turns out my network routing tables were messed up so all tests were performed over wifi - arrghhhh! |O Over cabled network it's not doing ~300 requests/second.... It's doing ~1100 requests/second!!!! Bam! Thats almost as fast as a Dolorean in overdrive! With such result there is plenty room to make a poor-mans-datalogger sampling maybe several values at e.g. 100Hz or more. Oh, and the screenshot live view feature in lxi-gui is now even more smooth hitting about 7 frames/second. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |