Products > Test Equipment
Open source lxi-tools and liblxi v1.0 released for GNU/Linux
<< < (39/67) > >>
Dwaine:
That worked great.  I had to change the Makefile.in for the fedora qmake-qt5. It was defaulting to qmake.

The GUI is really nice. Worked great with my Rigol scope.  Testing out the graphing with my DM3068.
lundmar:

--- Quote from: Dwaine on January 29, 2018, 12:15:12 am ---That worked great.  I had to change the Makefile.in for the fedora qmake-qt5. It was defaulting to qmake.

The GUI is really nice. Worked great with my Rigol scope.  Testing out the graphing with my DM3068.

--- End quote ---

Great, and thanks  :-+

I'm pretty happy with the general design of the GUI - I hope we can keep this simple layout even as more features are added in the future.

FYI - the issue with calling the correct qmake should be resolved in latest git (it is now calling QT5 qmake indirectly via the qtchooser tool).

ralphrmartin:
Lundmar

Just a quick comment - the GUI is a little inflexible for small screens. I am running all this on a MacBook Air (under VirtualBox) which gives me an effective screen height of  just over 700 pixels. As a result, the bottom of the window is cut off, and there is no scroll bar etc to make it visible. Is there any simple way to make the window a bit more friendly to smaller screens?

Thanks for all the good work on this!

Ralph
lundmar:

--- Quote from: ralphrmartin on January 30, 2018, 10:42:28 am ---Lundmar

Just a quick comment - the GUI is a little inflexible for small screens. I am running all this on a MacBook Air (under VirtualBox) which gives me an effective screen height of  just over 700 pixels. As a result, the bottom of the window is cut off, and there is no scroll bar etc to make it visible. Is there any simple way to make the window a bit more friendly to smaller screens?

Thanks for all the good work on this!

Ralph

--- End quote ---

Hmm, isn't mac supposed to have them fancy high resolution Retina displays? ;)

I've reduced the minimum window size to 700x600 so I assume you can fit it now.
lundmar:
I had to go back and update the benchmark performance numbers for the Siglent SDS1204X-E because it turns out my network routing tables were messed up so all tests were performed over wifi - arrghhhh!  |O

Over cabled network it's not doing ~300 requests/second.... It's doing ~1100 requests/second!!!!

Bam! Thats almost as fast as a Dolorean in overdrive!

With such result there is plenty room to make a poor-mans-datalogger sampling maybe several values at e.g. 100Hz or more.

Oh, and the screenshot live view feature in lxi-gui is now even more smooth hitting about 7 frames/second.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod