Products > Test Equipment
Open source lxi-tools and liblxi v1.0 released for GNU/Linux
Dwaine:
That worked great. I had to change the Makefile.in for the fedora qmake-qt5. It was defaulting to qmake.
The GUI is really nice. Worked great with my Rigol scope. Testing out the graphing with my DM3068.
lundmar:
--- Quote from: Dwaine on January 29, 2018, 12:15:12 am ---That worked great. I had to change the Makefile.in for the fedora qmake-qt5. It was defaulting to qmake.
The GUI is really nice. Worked great with my Rigol scope. Testing out the graphing with my DM3068.
--- End quote ---
Great, and thanks :-+
I'm pretty happy with the general design of the GUI - I hope we can keep this simple layout even as more features are added in the future.
FYI - the issue with calling the correct qmake should be resolved in latest git (it is now calling QT5 qmake indirectly via the qtchooser tool).
ralphrmartin:
Lundmar
Just a quick comment - the GUI is a little inflexible for small screens. I am running all this on a MacBook Air (under VirtualBox) which gives me an effective screen height of just over 700 pixels. As a result, the bottom of the window is cut off, and there is no scroll bar etc to make it visible. Is there any simple way to make the window a bit more friendly to smaller screens?
Thanks for all the good work on this!
Ralph
lundmar:
--- Quote from: ralphrmartin on January 30, 2018, 10:42:28 am ---Lundmar
Just a quick comment - the GUI is a little inflexible for small screens. I am running all this on a MacBook Air (under VirtualBox) which gives me an effective screen height of just over 700 pixels. As a result, the bottom of the window is cut off, and there is no scroll bar etc to make it visible. Is there any simple way to make the window a bit more friendly to smaller screens?
Thanks for all the good work on this!
Ralph
--- End quote ---
Hmm, isn't mac supposed to have them fancy high resolution Retina displays? ;)
I've reduced the minimum window size to 700x600 so I assume you can fit it now.
lundmar:
I had to go back and update the benchmark performance numbers for the Siglent SDS1204X-E because it turns out my network routing tables were messed up so all tests were performed over wifi - arrghhhh! |O
Over cabled network it's not doing ~300 requests/second.... It's doing ~1100 requests/second!!!!
Bam! Thats almost as fast as a Dolorean in overdrive!
With such result there is plenty room to make a poor-mans-datalogger sampling maybe several values at e.g. 100Hz or more.
Oh, and the screenshot live view feature in lxi-gui is now even more smooth hitting about 7 frames/second.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version