Author Topic: Oscilloscope Choice: Yokogawa DL1740EL or Iwatsu DS-5624A or Tektronics TBS2204B  (Read 4787 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline asterionTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: us
Hello, I’ve been waiting to buy a decent oscilloscope for a while now and I have found a store with the following used ones in stock. Any info/recommendations on why to choose one over the other would be appreciated.

I don’t have a specific feature I am looking for but I do want to optimize bang/buck.

Yokogawa DL1740EL
Iwatsu DS-5624A
Tektronica TBS2204B


Thanks in advance!
 

Offline coromonadalix

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7103
  • Country: ca
well you are in some of them  "oldies"

you have to check  for servicing or parts availability,   for me i would go to the TEK,  and be sure they all pass self tests and have a proof of that

i ask the seller to put his avatar name in the self test screen and screenshot picture, if not   i move away

you have some threads for the tds2k 3k series ...

Yokogawa ?  there is a few

Iwatsu ?
« Last Edit: May 28, 2024, 11:58:58 am by coromonadalix »
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28493
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
well you are in some of them  "oldies"
Only the Yokogawa DL1740EL is an older model (but 500MHz). The others are relatively new. Unless 500MHz is needed, I'd leave the DL1740EL at the shop. The DL1740EL is a nice compact oscilloscope (I have owned one) but the others have nicer displays and an easier user interface. Also the analog fronted gets rather hot and the implemented cooling solution is quite bad. In the one I had, some of the pre-amplifier chips where replaced and one needed replacing again. Based on specs the Iwatsu DS-5624A might be the most versatile one.

The Tektronix TBS2204B can't be compared with the TDS2k or TDS3k series. The TBS2204B is aimed at educational / repair shop work. Simple, but effective. A customer one mine has a TBS2000A series and everyone prefers to use that one instead of the Rigol and other cheap scopes that are around the lab.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2024, 12:20:44 pm by nctnico »
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: dzseki

Offline asterionTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: us
Ah appreciate the info! So I can get the Iwatsu for ~1300 while the Tek is around ~2500. Is there anything on the Tek that might make it worth that much more?

I’ll talk to the shop owner and see if he can run the self test before buy.
 

Offline tunk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1115
  • Country: no
No expert, but you may want to check the prices on new comparable scopes from e.g. Siglent or Rigol.
 

Offline kripton2035

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2726
  • Country: fr
    • kripton2035 schematics repository
Yep for that price (and less), any new rigol or siglent will outperform all of these old scopes...
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28493
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
No expert, but you may want to check the prices on new comparable scopes from e.g. Siglent or Rigol.
Comparable... not so much. Reputable A-brand scopes versus low cost scopes. Like comparing a set of blue Gedore wrenches with Chinese branded ones you typically find at the supermarket. Use both types and you can tell the difference for sure; you'll want the ones from Gedore. If the models would be comparable, then the A-brands would be able to sell them at the same low price. Ofcourse you can always decide the cheap tools are good enough for you.

Still, the asking price of the shop is way too high. The DL1740EL is a good deal for $100 because it is pretty much obsolete. For the DS-5624A and TBS2204B I'd start negotiations at 1/3rd of the asking price and walk away if the shop doesn't want to come down below half the asking price. It is very possible though that the TBS2204B has some manufacturer warranty left. Tektronix offers a 5 year warranty on many of their products.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2024, 04:02:07 pm by nctnico »
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline coromonadalix

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7103
  • Country: ca
same tought   

They are high priced for old / or used stuff,  huge profit margin

I would not even talk to them at this price range


Better buy new  Siglent and Rigol are hack .... / upgreadable on the banwidth,  which gives you better bang for the bucks


 

Online KungFuJosh

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3191
  • Country: us
  • TEAS is real.
No expert, but you may want to check the prices on new comparable scopes from e.g. Siglent or Rigol.
Reputable A-brand scopes versus low cost scopes.

Siglent is a reputable A brand now. Better hardware and support than the overpriced paperweights being compared, especially when you get into the $2k and $3k ranges.
"Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before." - Steven Wright
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28493
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
I want the stuff you are smoking  :popcorn:  I'll leave it at that. I've wasted more than enough time & money on cheap tools.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Online KungFuJosh

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3191
  • Country: us
  • TEAS is real.
I want the stuff you are smoking  :popcorn:  I'll leave it at that. I've wasted more than enough time & money on cheap tools.

I don't want cheap tools either, but I also refuse to pay for old garbage. If you think an SDS3000X HD is a "cheap" tool, then please buy me two. 😉
"Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before." - Steven Wright
 

Offline le_yum

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 9
  • Country: be
I want the stuff you are smoking  :popcorn:  I'll leave it at that. I've wasted more than enough time & money on cheap tools.

I don't want cheap tools either, but I also refuse to pay for old garbage. If you think an SDS3000X HD is a "cheap" tool, then please buy me two. 😉

rebrand it Lecroy, double the price, and suddenly it becomes "premium" )
 

Online KungFuJosh

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3191
  • Country: us
  • TEAS is real.
I want the stuff you are smoking  :popcorn:  I'll leave it at that. I've wasted more than enough time & money on cheap tools.

I don't want cheap tools either, but I also refuse to pay for old garbage. If you think an SDS3000X HD is a "cheap" tool, then please buy me two. 😉

rebrand it Lecroy, double the price, and suddenly it becomes "premium" )

lol the price sure does!
"Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before." - Steven Wright
 

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 17571
  • Country: 00
I would not even talk to them at this price range

Me either.

For that much money you can get a new Siglent SDS2000 series which will blow them all away.
 
The following users thanked this post: KungFuJosh

Offline thm_w

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7625
  • Country: ca
  • Non-expert
No expert, but you may want to check the prices on new comparable scopes from e.g. Siglent or Rigol.
Comparable... not so much. Reputable A-brand scopes versus low cost scopes. Like comparing a set of blue Gedore wrenches with Chinese branded ones you typically find at the supermarket. Use both types and you can tell the difference for sure; you'll want the ones from Gedore. If the models would be comparable, then the A-brands would be able to sell them at the same low price. Ofcourse you can always decide the cheap tools are good enough for you.

Terrible analogy.
The Gedore wrench costs ~10x+ that of a no-name wrench. No one is suggesting OP to go and buy a $300 scope.
Profile -> Modify profile -> Look and Layout ->  Don't show users' signatures
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28493
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Just wait a few more hours  :popcorn:
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: KungFuJosh

Offline aeg

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 132
  • Country: us
I would skip your local store. Even if you want a Tektronix, there is (for example) a working TDS2024B on eBay for less than one third the price your guy is asking. If you need long sample depth, TBS2000 series has a list price starting at $1640, brand new! And that would be known working, with warranty, calibrated.

If this is your first scope then you might consider an Owon HDS272S for less than $300, brand new. It's much worse than the Tektronix, but you asked for a "decent" oscilloscope, not a "great" one. You can spend the other $2000 on parts, power supplies, soldering equipment, etc.
 

Online KungFuJosh

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3191
  • Country: us
  • TEAS is real.
Just wait a few more hours  :popcorn:

You win. 🤣🤣🤣

But forget Owon trash, if they're going to shoot that low in price, they should look at the SDS804X HD for $440.
"Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before." - Steven Wright
 

Offline temperance

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 716
  • Country: 00
I'm waiting for the Rigol crowd to  :box:
 

Offline Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1343
  • Country: ch
No one is suggesting OP to go and buy a $300 scope.

Why not? (Well, maybe $500+)
The OP says, "I don't have a specific feature I'm looking for, but I want to optimize bang/buck."

Maybe it would be helpful if the OP told us if he already has a scope and which one.
Then we could estimate what he means by "decent" or what the next step could be.

Buying a used scope for $2500 for no particular reason is not very smart imo.
« Last Edit: May 29, 2024, 07:51:09 am by Aldo22 »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Online EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 39219
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Ah appreciate the info! So I can get the Iwatsu for ~1300 while the Tek is around ~2500. Is there anything on the Tek that might make it worth that much more?

Those are crazy prices, don't touch them!
For $1300 (presume USD?) you can get a LOT better brand new Siglent or Rigol or other scope.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, asterion

Online EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 39219
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
No one is suggesting OP to go and buy a $300 scope.

Why not? (Well, maybe $500+)
The OP says, "I don't have a specific feature I'm looking for, but I want to optimize bang/buck."

That's definitely not happening in this case.

Quote
Maybe it would be helpful if the OP told us if he already has a scope and which one.
Then we could estimate what he means by "decent" or what the next step could be.

Buying a used scope for $2500 for no particular reason is not very smart imo.

I've done a video on exactly this:
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, Aldo22

Online EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 39219
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
No expert, but you may want to check the prices on new comparable scopes from e.g. Siglent or Rigol.
Reputable A-brand scopes versus low cost scopes.

Siglent is a reputable A brand now.

Good enough for Lecroy to rebadge them.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, KungFuJosh

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28493
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Ah appreciate the info! So I can get the Iwatsu for ~1300 while the Tek is around ~2500. Is there anything on the Tek that might make it worth that much more?

Those are crazy prices, don't touch them!
For $1300 (presume USD?) you can get a LOT better brand new Siglent or Rigol or other scope.
Did you read the endlessly long bug threads on your own forum?  :) More features: probably yes if they work as intended. Better: definitely debatable. I used to be a big Siglent supporter as they where going to 'stick it to' the big A brands and make them lower their prices. But in the mean time I've learned the only people Siglent (and Rigol too) are 'sticking it to' are their own customers. In the past decade I have a spend (directly and indirectly) over 3000 euro (ex VAT) on Siglent gear which turned out to be useless for the purpose it was bought for due to bugs / shortcomings. Bottom line: if you pay peanuts, you get monkeys so don't expect to pay less and still get the same quality. Ofcourse people can decide for themselves if they want to save money or that a cheaper unit is perfect for their needs. But even for occasional hobby use it can be worthwhile to go for the better polished gear even if it doesn't have all the bells & whistles and/or it is second hand. Except for the Yokogawa, the oscilloscopes the OP is looking at are definitely not old units. The Tektronix one (TBS2000B series) was released only a few years ago.

And as I wrote before the prices the shop is asking are way too high, there is likely a lot of wiggle room; a decent price would be a little bit below half the price the shop is asking.

Siglent is a reputable A brand now.
Good enough for Lecroy to rebadge them.
But not always with great success. AFAIK Lecroy does quite a bit of quality control on the firmware themselves before releasing a product nowadays. They have got bitten badly in the past by rebranding Siglent products. Don't mention 'Waveace' to any of their sales reps... It looks like Lecroy has cancelled 'Waveace' as a product line.
« Last Edit: May 29, 2024, 08:35:21 am by nctnico »
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7522
  • Country: hr
Ah appreciate the info! So I can get the Iwatsu for ~1300 while the Tek is around ~2500. Is there anything on the Tek that might make it worth that much more?

Those are crazy prices, don't touch them!
For $1300 (presume USD?) you can get a LOT better brand new Siglent or Rigol or other scope.
Did you read the endlessly long bug threads on your own forum?  :) More features: probably yes if they work as intended. Better: definitely debatable. I used to be a big Siglent supporter as they where going to 'stick it to' the big A brands and make them lower their prices. But in the mean time I've learned the only people Siglent (and Rigol too) are 'sticking it to' are their own customers. In the past decade I have a spend (directly and indirectly) about 3000 euro (ex VAT) on Siglent gear which turned out to be useless for the purpose it was bought for due to bugs / shortcomings. Bottom line: if you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. Ofcourse people can decide for themselves if they want to save money or that a cheaper unit is perfect for their needs. But even for occasional hobby use it can be worthwhile to go for the better polished gear even if it doesn't have all the bells & whistles and/or it is second hand. Except for the Yokogawa, the oscilloscopes the OP is looking at are definitely not old units. The Tektronix one (TBS2000B series) was released only a few years ago.

And as I wrote before the prices the shop is asking are way too high, there is likely a lot of wiggle room; a decent price would be a little bit below half the price the shop is asking.

You are a hater, that is what you are.
You had experience with Siglent 10 years ago and you are crusader since.

And I posted few days ago a list of bugs by your beloved R&S for RTB2000:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/siglent-sds800x-hd-12-bit-dsos-coming/msg5513029/#msg5513029
Which is a scope that cost 10x more than SDS800xHD.

Why don't you call that "shit full of bugs"?
Because you have double standards.
And also so set in your ways, that anything that is different to what you are used to is "wrong". It cannot be that you are incapable to learn. "Old dog, new tricks" situation...

And as critical as I am to Rigol (they are much worse, bug wise, that Siglent) they also eventually iron important things out. They tend to leave some things unresolved but so do A brands. Refer to R&S release notes .

Endlessly long threads? Like Rigol threads where people keep arguing for pages about some detail, while list of bugs is like 20 in total. Or where we have recent new Siglent user that opens 4 topics on same "bug" that ends up being user error. And then he writes 2000 posts (literally) on "bugs", while constantly repeating same 12 bugs in total. On a brand new, released
As for 12 bugs in total, again, I refer you to R&S release notes...

Only scope from A brands that I would personally vouch for to have minimum bugs is my Keysight MSOX3104T.
But that is only because that is 10 years old design (even older if you trace its design origins in 3000A and 4000A series) and is becoming dated today... They had all the time in the world.
And they still had embarrassing moments when they released USB2.0 decoder/trigger for 3000T series, just to have customers tell them it didn't work. After investigation, they realised 3000T didn't have FPGA capable of doing that (only 4000 has) and it seems protocol was copied from 4000 and nobody ever even tested once if it works or not. And was released like that....

So your rants are just that, rants, without basis in reality.

Truth is different. A brands significantly decreased in quality in last 10ish years. B brands significantly improved both quality and sophistication of their equipment in meantime.
While B brands are not perfect, gap was never smaller.

And there is one point where cheap car becomes as reliable and dependable as A to B transport as an expensive luxury brand, and also comfortable enough to take long trips with ease.  And all the difference to the luxury brand is price and glitz. Leather seats, 22 speakers 6 screen multimedia, and fancy, fancy design..
Stuff that doesn't matter for actual A to B transportation. Just prestige and bragging rights.
« Last Edit: May 29, 2024, 09:12:42 am by 2N3055 »
"Just hard work is not enough - it must be applied sensibly."
Dr. Richard W. Hamming
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, Momchilo

Offline Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1343
  • Country: ch
I've done a video on exactly this:

You say in the video:
"Price category is everything when you're talking about scopes."
Very true! But why not be consistent?
In the video you actively advise against ~$150 scopes.
But this is also a price category and even these scopes can be more than enough for many hobbyists.
In some cases, even the AWG is already included.
I see no reason to categorically exclude this price category. Just take them for what they are.
Any scope is better than no scope.  ;)
« Last Edit: May 29, 2024, 10:19:08 am by Aldo22 »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline thm_w

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7625
  • Country: ca
  • Non-expert
No one is suggesting OP to go and buy a $300 scope.
Why not? (Well, maybe $500+)
The OP says, "I don't have a specific feature I'm looking for, but I want to optimize bang/buck."

No but I'm giving them enough credit that they would need 200MHz+ and a decent size screen since they listed 200/500MHz scopes. If they don't then that is their fault for not specificity requirements better. Why would we try to save them money when they can't be bothered to post the relevant info?

Quote
Maybe it would be helpful if the OP told us if he already has a scope and which one.
Then we could estimate what he means by "decent" or what the next step could be.

Exactly, pointless speculation until they give details.

Very true! But why not be consistent?
In the video you actively advise against ~$150 scopes.
But this is also a price category and even these scopes can be more than enough for many hobbyists.

- The quality/features a $300 scope gets you over a $150 is arguably more than 2x
- The type of people Dave is targeting, IMO, are more serious hobbyists or people that will be using the scope for years to come and expanding their skills and knowledge. $150 is fine if you continue to do basic hobby projects, but not if you plan to grow at all.
Profile -> Modify profile -> Look and Layout ->  Don't show users' signatures
 
The following users thanked this post: Aldo22

Online EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 39219
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
I've done a video on exactly this:

You say in the video:
"Price category is everything when you're talking about scopes."
Very true! But why not be consistent?
In the video you actively advise against ~$150 scopes.
But this is also a price category and even these scopes can be more than enough for many hobbyists.
In some cases, even the AWG is already included.
I see no reason to categorically exclude this price category. Just take them for what they are.
Any scope is better than no scope.  ;)

Yeah, fair enough. And I've said as much in cheap scope reviews.
Usually people are talking about a bench scope though.
 
The following users thanked this post: Aldo22

Online EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 39219
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
- The quality/features a $300 scope gets you over a $150 is arguably more than 2x
- The type of people Dave is targeting, IMO, are more serious hobbyists or people that will be using the scope for years to come and expanding their skills and knowledge. $150 is fine if you continue to do basic hobby projects, but not if you plan to grow at all.

Yes, this.
As I said, people are usually talking about a bench scope when they ask the "what first scope should I buy question".
If they genuinely only have $50 or $100 to spend, then I'm not going to insist that they forget it unless they have $300.
 

Offline jonpaul

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3668
  • Country: fr
  • Analog, magnetics, Power, HV, Audio, Cinema
    • IEEE Spectrum
Dave we used many Yokogawa Japanese scopes since 1992,

1560, DL1740, DL7440.

All have been easy to use, robust and ergonomic controls.

Main failure was dead backup battery, easy to replace.

I have no info on Iwatsu but found early TEK digital like TDS350 somewhat hard to use.

Still using the YEW 1740 and 7440.

Just my experience,

Jon
An Internet Dinosaur...
 

Online EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 39219
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Did you read the endlessly long bug threads on your own forum?  :) More features: probably yes if they work as intended. Better: definitely debatable. I used to be a big Siglent supporter as they where going to 'stick it to' the big A brands and make them lower their prices. But in the mean time I've learned the only people Siglent (and Rigol too) are 'sticking it to' are their own customers. In the past decade I have a spend (directly and indirectly) over 3000 euro (ex VAT) on Siglent gear which turned out to be useless for the purpose it was bought for due to bugs / shortcomings.

Ok, so you've had a bad experience with Siglent, fair enough. But I'm sure even you have to admit that others haven't, and that Siglent a serious player with serious products, with countless satisfied customers, both low end and advanced.

2N3055 mentioned R&S. My MXO4 R&S scope is the only scope I've ever had that I personally found several major bugs that entirely locked up the scope. No other scope has ever done that, not Siglent, not Rigol, not even the $50 cheapie handhelds. It also had a loose screw that rattled around in the chassis. To the credit of R&S they fixed it quick smart.
The Keysight 3000 is the only scope I've had that has released the magic scope due to a hardware design fault.

Quote
Bottom line: if you pay peanuts, you get monkeys so don't expect to pay less and still get the same quality. Ofcourse people can decide for themselves if they want to save money or that a cheaper unit is perfect for their needs.

Welcome to the complex world of "bang per buck".

Quote
But even for occasional hobby use it can be worthwhile to go for the better polished gear even if it doesn't have all the bells & whistles and/or it is second hand. Except for the Yokogawa, the oscilloscopes the OP is looking at are definitely not old units. The Tektronix one (TBS2000B series) was released only a few years ago.

Sure, fair argument. But what's not fair is outright bashing the likes of Siglent for everyone just because you had a personal issue with it.

Quote
And as I wrote before the prices the shop is asking are way too high, there is likely a lot of wiggle room; a decent price would be a little bit below half the price the shop is asking.
But not always with great success. AFAIK Lecroy does quite a bit of quality control on the firmware themselves before releasing a product nowadays. They have got bitten badly in the past by rebranding Siglent products. Don't mention 'Waveace' to any of their sales reps... It looks like Lecroy has cancelled 'Waveace' as a product line.

And even though they got "bitten" just like you did, Lecroy decided to trust Siglent again.
 
The following users thanked this post: Performa01, egonotto, thm_w, 2N3055

Offline Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1343
  • Country: ch
- The quality/features a $300 scope gets you over a $150 is arguably more than 2x
That may be true, but a $150 scope is 1000x better than no scope!  ;D

- The type of people Dave is targeting, IMO, are more serious hobbyists or people that will be using the scope for years to come and expanding their skills and knowledge. $150 is fine if you continue to do basic hobby projects, but not if you plan to grow at all.
Well, in the $150 category you certainly don't have the next 10 years in mind, but you have to start somewhere and I see nothing wrong with starting with something cheap to realize what you really need.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1343
  • Country: ch
Usually people are talking about a bench scope though.

I'm also talking about a bench scope.
Are you saying that because of the AWG?
The Hantek DSO2000 (which I bought for USD 130 on sale last November) has the AWG hardware built in (every model), you just have to “activate” it.
The AWG even has some nice features that you wouldn't expect for the extremely low price (single, short pulses (20ns), AM/FM up to 25MHz...).
« Last Edit: May 30, 2024, 08:11:35 am by Aldo22 »
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28493
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Did you read the endlessly long bug threads on your own forum?  :) More features: probably yes if they work as intended. Better: definitely debatable. I used to be a big Siglent supporter as they where going to 'stick it to' the big A brands and make them lower their prices. But in the mean time I've learned the only people Siglent (and Rigol too) are 'sticking it to' are their own customers. In the past decade I have a spend (directly and indirectly) over 3000 euro (ex VAT) on Siglent gear which turned out to be useless for the purpose it was bought for due to bugs / shortcomings.

Ok, so you've had a bad experience with Siglent, fair enough. But I'm sure even you have to admit that others haven't, and that Siglent a serious player with serious products, with countless satisfied customers, both low end and advanced.

2N3055 mentioned R&S. My MXO4 R&S scope is the only scope I've ever had that I personally found several major bugs that entirely locked up the scope. No other scope has ever done that, not Siglent, not Rigol, not even the $50 cheapie handhelds. It also had a loose screw that rattled around in the chassis. To the credit of R&S they fixed it quick smart.
But still: R&S knows what they are doing and have the capacity to fix things quickly and in the right way. The RTM3004 R&S send me for a review also had some issues when I got it but it got fixed quickly as well. Unfortunately that is the world we live in. Products get released ahead of schedule.
Quote

Quote
Bottom line: if you pay peanuts, you get monkeys so don't expect to pay less and still get the same quality. Ofcourse people can decide for themselves if they want to save money or that a cheaper unit is perfect for their needs.

Welcome to the complex world of "bang per buck".

Quote
But even for occasional hobby use it can be worthwhile to go for the better polished gear even if it doesn't have all the bells & whistles and/or it is second hand. Except for the Yokogawa, the oscilloscopes the OP is looking at are definitely not old units. The Tektronix one (TBS2000B series) was released only a few years ago.

Sure, fair argument. But what's not fair is outright bashing the likes of Siglent for everyone just because you had a personal issue with it.
I don't have a personal issue with Siglent. I just look at it from a commercial perspective.

Take these fairly recent threads for example (there are many more):
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/siglent-1202x-e-serial-decoding-not-working/
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/siglent-sdg1032-as-bad-as-rigol-dg812/

Now imagine these people are on your payroll and spend days chasing their tails due to equipment not working and technical support being useless (as Siglent support doesn't even know how a UART protocol looks like in the wild judging by the first thread). And for sure you can argue that especially the 2nd thread is made by someone lacking experience but if you read carefully  / sifting through the information, you'll see that the oddities (lets put it that way) in the Siglent generator isn't helping to move the person forward.

And my personal experience with Siglent is along the same lines. A couple of years ago I had two very clever junior engineers (working for one of my customers) chasing their tails for over 2 weeks worth of time due to a bug in the Siglent SDG2000 series generator (which is a highly popular and recommended model on this forum). Then I had to step in and also spend over a day figuring out what the hell was wrong with their setup (which wasn't a simple project at all) AND then spend time to hack something together to replace the generator ASAP. That loss of time has cost way more compared to buying an A-brand generator from the start.

So yes, I also tried to trust Siglent again but needless to say I'm not planning on trying again any time soon based on the problems people on this forum run into (the same goes for Rigol BTW). In general I rather spend a bit more on A-brand equipment where it comes to key equipment, knowing that it will work as advertised, knowing that I get sensible answers from technical support than making do. In the end it saves me time and irritation (which is equally true for hobbyists BTW).

So I'm not bashing at all. Just making a fact based statement so people can make an informed choice for themselves based on requirements and budget. Bashing would be to write A-brands are overpriced crap and owners of a Mercedes are utterly stupid  8)
« Last Edit: May 30, 2024, 09:13:35 am by nctnico »
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline coromonadalix

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7103
  • Country: ca
For me Rigol was more deceptive,  but i wont bash them because of that

Every brand have their quirks, and yes sadly you may or may not know them all

my only hopes are : that theses companies will upgrade their FW to correct them fast, and not make people wait years


And the expression (150$  for a scope is better than nothing), i'll personally choose nothing,    i've gone to / from the cheapest to the good,  Hantek ... to .... 
you may waste more time with theses, than having a better range of products (BTW not just scopes), but even paying for better does not mean you wont have any problems ...

and you better keep and save your money to improve or choose better, the vintage effect is still here too,  witch mess things up ...


We are checking to buy the SDS7k Siglent series after a demo was sent to us,  very good scope

But for me:  just asking permission to execute an auto setup  is the @#%@@ i've seen,  but  it does not mean the rest is crap ... 
but for me this thingy, is a major annoyance,   all depends on how you see things


you'll never get the perfect picture, even if you pay thousands,   

I understand  Nctnico ...   i may say so far  we are lucky, and we do automatisations with Siglent sdg1000 series and sds1000x scopes, done tests with the SDS7k 3ghz model  all is good ... for now  the IT guy is happy  loll 

SO far with "upgrades" we saved 10k $$$  with many Siglent instruments  :-+
« Last Edit: May 30, 2024, 09:58:54 am by coromonadalix »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, thm_w

Offline Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1343
  • Country: ch
And the expression (150$  for a scope is better than nothing), i'll personally choose nothing,   
If you don't have better one? I don't believe you.  ;)
This price range is certainly not for professionals or advanced amateurs.

you may waste more time with theses,
Yes, that's what hobbies are for, to waste time.   ;D
 

Offline temperance

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 716
  • Country: 00
Quote
And my personal experience with Siglent is along the same lines. A couple of years ago I had two very clever junior engineers (working for one of my customers) chasing their tails for over 2 weeks worth of time due to a bug in the Siglent SDG2000 series generator (which is a highly popular and recommended model on this forum). Then I had to step in and also spend over a day figuring out what the hell was wrong with their setup (which wasn't a simple project at all) AND then spend time to hack something together to replace the generator ASAP. That loss of time has cost way more compared to buying an A-brand generator from the start.

They must have been Very Clever to the point of geniuses if they couldn't find out by themself what is wrong in two weeks with two people and it took you only little over day to find out.
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28493
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Quote
And my personal experience with Siglent is along the same lines. A couple of years ago I had two very clever junior engineers (working for one of my customers) chasing their tails for over 2 weeks worth of time due to a bug in the Siglent SDG2000 series generator (which is a highly popular and recommended model on this forum). Then I had to step in and also spend over a day figuring out what the hell was wrong with their setup (which wasn't a simple project at all) AND then spend time to hack something together to replace the generator ASAP. That loss of time has cost way more compared to buying an A-brand generator from the start.

They must have been Very Clever to the point of geniuses if they couldn't find out by themself what is wrong in two weeks with two people and it took you only little over day to find out.
There is something like tunnelvision and not expecting test equipment to misbehave. When developing something, your test equipment is like a golden standard. It 'only' took me a day because the engineers had already checked everything they could and had run out of possible causes for the effect they where seeing; it is not like I redid all their work. At that point I got the idea of doing an equipment check as a last ditch effort.
« Last Edit: May 30, 2024, 01:57:43 pm by nctnico »
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline Caliaxy

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 307
  • Country: us
But for me:  just asking permission to execute an auto setup  is the @#%@@ i've seen,  but  it does not mean the rest is crap ... 

Ha-ha - so you are one of those guys who never hits the Auto button unintentionally while crafting a complicated acquisition…. :-DD
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28493
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
But for me:  just asking permission to execute an auto setup  is the @#%@@ i've seen,  but  it does not mean the rest is crap ... 

Ha-ha - so you are one of those guys who never hits the Auto button unintentionally while crafting a complicated acquisition…. :-DD
Autoset typically screws everything up so I avoid pressing it. The Iwatsu DS-5624A the OP has listed actually has a system setting to disable the autoset button. All oscilloscopes should have this feature...
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1343
  • Country: ch
Autoset typically screws everything up so I avoid pressing it. The Iwatsu DS-5624A the OP has listed actually has a system setting to disable the autoset button. All oscilloscopes should have this feature...
The Hantek DSO2000 has a cancel option. I have often used this.
Manual says:
Cancel: Let the oscilloscope recall the previous setup.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline Caliaxy

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 307
  • Country: us
But for me:  just asking permission to execute an auto setup  is the @#%@@ i've seen,  but  it does not mean the rest is crap ... 

Ha-ha - so you are one of those guys who never hits the Auto button unintentionally while crafting a complicated acquisition…. :-DD
Autoset typically screws everything up so I avoid pressing it. The Iwatsu DS-5624A the OP has listed actually has a system setting to disable the autoset button. All oscilloscopes should have this feature...

Totally agree. I avoid pressing it too, but it occasionally happens when I switch scopes. Not only Autoset screws everything up (most of the times...) but it also takes its time doing it, leaving you with nothing better to do but watch what you just did, for quite a few looong seconds. Then you have to start over...

I have recently used a Rigol MSO5000, with the Autoset button placed conveniently close the Run/Stop button (same color, same size, same tactile feeling). Not fun. Siglent SDS1104 also has the Autoset button dangerously close to the Run/Stop button, but at least they bothered to choose a different color for it (bright blue). Keysights and more expensive Siglents (e.g. SDS2000) have the Autoset button recessed (aren't they smart?), so at least you feel you are pressing the wrong button. Might have stopped a few slow, hesitant people with low-self confidence. :) Kudos to Iwatsu for allowing you disable the feature altogehter.
 

Online KungFuJosh

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3191
  • Country: us
  • TEAS is real.
Keysights and more expensive Siglents (e.g. SDS2000) have the Autoset button recessed (aren't they smart?), so at least you feel you are pressing the wrong button. Might have stopped a few slow, hesitant people with low-self confidence. :) Kudos to Iwatsu for allowing you disable the feature altogehter.

I'm in the opposite camp; I'm lazy, and when I can get away with it, Autoset is often a good starting point for me.

Siglent makes you press the Autoset button twice or confirm on screen (SDS2504X+ here). If I could disable the confirmation, I would. 😉
"Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before." - Steven Wright
 

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7522
  • Country: hr
I'm with the crowd that are happy that Autoset And Default should have confirmation..
We are all different, aparently....
"Just hard work is not enough - it must be applied sensibly."
Dr. Richard W. Hamming
 
The following users thanked this post: newbrain, KungFuJosh

Offline Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1343
  • Country: ch
I'm with the crowd that are happy that Autoset And Default should have confirmation..
We are all different, aparently....
The cheapest scope has cancel options for Autoset and Default Setup
Imo the best solution.  ;)
 

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7522
  • Country: hr
I'm with the crowd that are happy that Autoset And Default should have confirmation..
We are all different, aparently....
The cheapest scope has cancel options for Autoset and Default Setup
Imo the best solution.  ;)

Yes if that works for you.. Default I press only very deliberately, and Auto only by mistake. In which case I don't even want to wait for it to finish to press Undo... IMO.
"Just hard work is not enough - it must be applied sensibly."
Dr. Richard W. Hamming
 

Offline Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1343
  • Country: ch
Yes if that works for you.. Default I press only very deliberately, and Auto only by mistake. In which case I don't even want to wait for it to finish to press Undo... IMO.

Autoset takes 3 to 4 seconds and Default Setup works immediately.
I have no problem with this.
The important thing is that if you accidentally press the button, you can immediately restore the previous status.
 

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7522
  • Country: hr
Yes if that works for you.. Default I press only very deliberately, and Auto only by mistake. In which case I don't even want to wait for it to finish to press Undo... IMO.

Autoset takes 3 to 4 seconds and Default Setup works immediately.
I have no problem with this.
The important thing is that if you accidentally press the button, you can immediately restore the previous status.

You don't, I do. As far as I'm concerned, both Default and Autoset are buttons that I would like were used for something useful instead. On Siglent you can Default from menu anyways. Auto I don't need at all.
If in doubt, I can quickly set Auto triggering (or force if needed), set channel offset to zero and V/div large to get signal on screen. Press Trigger level for auto (it has that on Trigger) and twiddle timebase..

I never need Auto. I don't remember when I used it myself. Last time I did was to verify bug with Auto, long time ago. But never used it in work. I simply don't need it.
"Just hard work is not enough - it must be applied sensibly."
Dr. Richard W. Hamming
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, newbrain

Offline Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1343
  • Country: ch
You don't, I do. As far as I'm concerned, both Default and Autoset are buttons that I would like were used for something useful instead. On Siglent you can Default from menu anyways. Auto I don't need at all.
If in doubt, I can quickly set Auto triggering (or force if needed), set channel offset to zero and V/div large to get signal on screen. Press Trigger level for auto (it has that on Trigger) and twiddle timebase..

I never need Auto. I don't remember when I used it myself. Last time I did was to verify bug with Auto, long time ago. But never used it in work. I simply don't need it.

That probably depends on the scope.
You need to know what Autoset does so that you can decide whether it makes sense.
With my scope, Autoset changes many parameters, including acq. mode, mem. depth, BW limitation, coupling...
So if I want a kind of “reset”, Autoset can save me a few button presses.
If I want to keep the channel and acquisition settings, it is of course not suitable (if it happens anyway -> Cancel )
« Last Edit: May 30, 2024, 09:25:20 pm by Aldo22 »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline thm_w

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7625
  • Country: ca
  • Non-expert
Well, in the $150 category you certainly don't have the next 10 years in mind, but you have to start somewhere and I see nothing wrong with starting with something cheap to realize what you really need.

The Hantek DSO2000 is currently selling for $202 for 2CH 100MHz: https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256802172076555.html
Thats not too bad.

If its the choice between having a scope and not as a hobbyist, can understand.
If you plan to use the thing to get you through school, I would use student loan money, save up a few more months, etc.
Profile -> Modify profile -> Look and Layout ->  Don't show users' signatures
 

Offline asterionTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: us
Appreciate all the info! I was hoping that by going the used route I could get a good scope for around 1k but that seems unrealistic now. In an ideal world I would have preferred a 500MHz 4 channel scope with some SPI/I2C decoding capabilities but I’m ok with 200MHz if that’s more realistic.

Right now I’m between the SDS3034XHD and SDS2204XH. The 3000 series seems like decent features but not sure if it’s worth the extra $1k.
 

Offline tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 29884
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Right now I’m between the SDS3034XHD and SDS2204XH. The 3000 series seems like decent features but not sure if it’s worth the extra $1k.
Officially, 200 vs 350 MHz
Tested, ~300 vs ~400 MHz
500 vs 1GHz designs
200 vs 400 Mpts
Zero vs active probe support

^ all that costs money.

My additional 1c worth, SDS2000X HD are whisper quiet and on promo with a killer deal offered on option bundle pricing until June 30.
https://siglentna.com/news-article/permanent-analysis-bundle-on-your-new-oscilloscope/

Yeah I know, decisions.......
Avid Rabid Hobbyist.
Some stuff seen @ Siglent HQ cannot be shared.
 
The following users thanked this post: asterion

Offline Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1343
  • Country: ch
Well, in the $150 category you certainly don't have the next 10 years in mind, but you have to start somewhere and I see nothing wrong with starting with something cheap to realize what you really need.

The Hantek DSO2000 is currently selling for $202 for 2CH 100MHz: https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256802172076555.html
Thats not too bad.

Sorry for being off topic, but I have to make this clear:
The trick with the DSO2000 is to buy it as cheaply as possible, otherwise you'll be unhappy afterwards.
You can get it here for $162 shipped:
https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256806164187706.html
Or tomorrow on "Choice day" also here:
https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256801658604066.html

It's only a question of price.
The DSO2000 is an incredible deal for that price (I bought mine for $130, including the AWG hardware), but I wouldn't pay "real money" ($250+) for it either.
If I wanted to spend more than $200, I'd save up for 12-bit / 4-channel. But that's a different decision...
 

Online KungFuJosh

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3191
  • Country: us
  • TEAS is real.
Appreciate all the info! I was hoping that by going the used route I could get a good scope for around 1k but that seems unrealistic now. In an ideal world I would have preferred a 500MHz 4 channel scope with some SPI/I2C decoding capabilities but I’m ok with 200MHz if that’s more realistic.

Right now I’m between the SDS3034XHD and SDS2204XH. The 3000 series seems like decent features but not sure if it’s worth the extra $1k.

Do you need direct active probe support? Is 500MHz max good enough for you?

If you don't need active probes, or to go above 500MHz, then the 2000 series is a better buy, especially with the sale bundle that tautech mentioned (the bundle costs less than the included logic probes). Besides the slightly quieter fan, I would also guess it has slightly better noise with the lower speed design.
"Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before." - Steven Wright
 
The following users thanked this post: asterion

Offline asterionTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: us
 I doubt I’ll ever really need to go above 500 MHz, but active probes can be nice for tuning crystals. Spending an extra 1k for that almost seems worth it when you account for all the extra features.
 
The following users thanked this post: KungFuJosh

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28493
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Then again, brand specific active probes are always locked to a manufacturer and may not even work on all models from that manufacturer. So if you buy an oscilloscope from a different brand you'll need different active probes.

There are lots of generic active and passive probes for HF and current on the market which will work with any oscilloscope. These are a better long term investment. Only downside is that you'll need to set the probe scaling factor manually.
« Last Edit: June 01, 2024, 12:08:38 am by nctnico »
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: shabaz, egonotto, moerm, asterion

Online KungFuJosh

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3191
  • Country: us
  • TEAS is real.
Exactly why I mentioned "direct active probe support." He could always get Lasmux's probe when ready.

There is an adapter that should eventually work with different probes on the SDS3000X HD. Not great yet though, but I suspect better support (more probe compatibility) will come in future firmware updates.
"Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before." - Steven Wright
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Online EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 39219
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
I doubt I’ll ever really need to go above 500 MHz, but active probes can be nice for tuning crystals. Spending an extra 1k for that almost seems worth it when you account for all the extra features.

You can get active probes that use a regular BNC input. No need to have a scope with that interface support, it's just a more convenient from a powering point of view and auto scale factor set.
« Last Edit: June 01, 2024, 05:51:03 am by EEVblog »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, asterion

Offline asterionTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: us
Ah nice! if I can get third party ones then the deal for the 200 MHz scope seems like a good option.
 

Offline moerm

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 55
  • Country: aq
  • pragmatic realist
Coming back to OP's question ...

Yokogawa DL1740EL
Iwatsu DS-5624A
Tektronica TBS2204B

... and a bit later ...
Ah appreciate the info! So I can get the Iwatsu for ~1300 while the Tek is around ~2500. Is there anything on the Tek that might make it worth that much more?

I’ll talk to the shop owner and see if he can run the self test before buy.

So it seems to me that spending $1000+ and up to $2500 is perfectly feasible and fine for OP. Hence, while I do understand that a hint at e.g. a modern Siglent scope may be useful, I think basic respect as well as the assumption that OP isn't an idiot and *has done* some thinking about what he is/should be aiming for should be expected.

Wrt his 3 candidates my opinion is that the Iwatsu probably is the best choice. Iwatsu is a very reputable company and the only major drawbacks seem to be that it's somewhat slow and that it's not a MSO (which for me personally is important but maybe not for OP).

IMO the Yokogawa isn't a worthy candidate because of its low sampling rate, and the Tektronix isn't because of its price.

If OP would be willing to consider modern scopes too I'd suggest to look at (only) Siglent scopes, preferably at not too new models i.e. models with mature firmware like the SDS2000X. Why Siglent? Because they are the only chinese manufacturer whom I consider a near-A brand.

Have a nice weekend everyone
VxWorks - Yes! Linux - meh. Windows - Thanks no, definitely.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28493
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
I guess you never heard about GW Instek and Micsig then.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline moerm

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 55
  • Country: aq
  • pragmatic realist
I guess you never heard about GW Instek and Micsig then.

Fair point. I agree that GW-Instek products (often) are not "cheap crap" - but a) that's not a chinese company (but taiwanese), and b) their products tend to be more expensive than comparable chinese products.

But again, fair point and I rather like many GW-Instek products. But the point here was about a potential cheap(ish) but good alternative and all in all IMO Siglent scopes seemed to be an attractive option.
VxWorks - Yes! Linux - meh. Windows - Thanks no, definitely.
 

Online EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 39219
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Ah nice! if I can get third party ones then the deal for the 200 MHz scope seems like a good option.

I have a Caltest CT4121, but it's discontinued now by the looks of it.
But there are others:
https://www.tequipment.net/Pico/TA112/Active-Differential-Oscilloscope-Probes/?v=7514

« Last Edit: June 02, 2024, 01:42:45 pm by EEVblog »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf