My opinion is that the 2000X is too expensive now compare to the DS1074Z and DS2000 series.
Even the 1074Z scope beats it on most fronts. It's wfms/s is slightly lower, and it might only sample at 1GSa/s or 250MSa/s on four channels, but it makes up for those limitations for the much lower price, and greater feature set (four channels, serial decode on all four channels, or two decodes at once, advanced triggers (incl serial trig), deep 24Mpt memory, etc.) For a bit extra you get the extra DDS hardware for sig gen (you're paying for it in the Agilent regardless of whether you use it or not.)
That's not to mention that Rigol fit all of the fast update rate (25,000) into one FPGA. Agilent spun an ASIC to do 50,000. I think that's an amazing achievement on Rigol's part.
I think Agilent is lucky to have the loyal base that will buy into a good brand name, and there's no doubt the 2000X is a good scope, but it's going to really have to drop a lot in price to compete in the next few years as Rigol gets even more popular. And there needs to be a lower-end 2000X (like a refresh of the 1000 series, moving away from badging Rigols) The fact that Agilent's T&M business is spinning off due to being a loss maker should indicate they need to improve their strategy... and hopefully not become another Tek. (Though it has to be said it appears like Tek are at least doing some product R&D with the MDO scopes.)