Author Topic: Hantek DSO2xxx schematics  (Read 14545 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online DavidAlfa

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5907
  • Country: es
Re: Hantek DSO2xxx schematics
« Reply #50 on: October 18, 2022, 01:59:10 pm »
AFAIK it's 2-layer only, then it's a little layout bug made by the trainees at hantek  :D
Hantek DSO2x1x            Drive        FAQ          DON'T BUY HANTEK! (Aka HALF-MADE)
Stm32 Soldering FW      Forum      Github      Donate
 

Online DavidAlfa

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5907
  • Country: es
Re: Hantek DSO2xxx schematics
« Reply #51 on: November 01, 2022, 11:14:15 am »
Is it me, or the AWG output protection diode D5 placement was a VERY bad idea?
External peaks will go right away into the +-5V analog voltage without any limitation, potentially killing a lot of stuff.
The diode and/or traces/pcb will burn in no time, and if the diode opens the voltage will reach the amplifier anyways.

Such stupid design. Should be placed at the pin 6 of the amplifier, so R9, R11, R143 limit the current, yet protecting the amp.
In the worst case, the damage will be just a burnt resistor.
Hantek DSO2x1x            Drive        FAQ          DON'T BUY HANTEK! (Aka HALF-MADE)
Stm32 Soldering FW      Forum      Github      Donate
 

Online pcprogrammerTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3706
  • Country: nl
Re: Hantek DSO2xxx schematics
« Reply #52 on: November 01, 2022, 11:39:46 am »
Yep would have been better. Always think twice before connecting something to this input/output.

Offline gnuarm

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2218
  • Country: pr
Re: Hantek DSO2xxx schematics
« Reply #53 on: December 28, 2022, 06:27:58 pm »
Is it me, or the AWG output protection diode D5 placement was a VERY bad idea?
External peaks will go right away into the +-5V analog voltage without any limitation, potentially killing a lot of stuff.
The diode and/or traces/pcb will burn in no time, and if the diode opens the voltage will reach the amplifier anyways.

I'm confused.  There are resistors totaling 50 ohms in either path.  That's 100 mA if you apply 10V when using the AWG.  If using the external trigger, it's 100 mA at 8.3V. 

Quote
Such stupid design. Should be placed at the pin 6 of the amplifier, so R9, R11, R143 limit the current, yet protecting the amp.
In the worst case, the damage will be just a burnt resistor.

Am I looking at a modified schematic?  What you think it should be?  If so, I agree. 

Although, I have done exactly this on designs before.  If there is no option for series resistance, this is still an effective way to deal with static. 

Hmmm, you are making me rethink this.  The design I'm referring to runs the signals through an analog switch for isolation.  The diodes are to ±12V on the connector side.  The 12V supply is on the motherboard and is supplying 8 of these circuits plus the motherboard circuitry.  The -12V is very light.  The idea of sinking the excess voltage into the supply, is that the normal supply current is greater than the surge current.  The -12V rail likely has almost no current.  So that's not good.  I thought the switches were ESD protected internally, but I only find this for one of the part numbers used.  I guess that's why I added the diodes. 

This is to a connector used for serial ports of different standards (RS-232, 422, 449, etc), and audio.  Not likely to be driven by anything beyond ±12V other than static.  Are networking equipment rooms anti-static protected? 

I'm redesigning this card to replace EOL components.  I will need to take better notes this time.  They've asked me to use parts that are expected to be in production for 10 years.  Not sure how that's going to happen.  They have a service that evaluates parts for them.  It will be interesting to see what they come up with.
Rick C.  --  Puerto Rico is not a country... It's part of the USA
  - Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
  - Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 

Online pcprogrammerTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3706
  • Country: nl
Re: Hantek DSO2xxx schematics
« Reply #54 on: December 28, 2022, 07:46:49 pm »
Am I looking at a modified schematic?  What you think it should be?  If so, I agree. 

Yep that is a modified schematic. The original is here: https://github.com/pecostm32/Hantek_DSO2000/blob/main/Schematics/Mainboard/Waveform%20Generator.png

Offline gnuarm

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2218
  • Country: pr
Re: Hantek DSO2xxx schematics
« Reply #55 on: December 29, 2022, 01:11:54 am »
Am I looking at a modified schematic?  What you think it should be?  If so, I agree. 

Yep that is a modified schematic. The original is here: https://github.com/pecostm32/Hantek_DSO2000/blob/main/Schematics/Mainboard/Waveform%20Generator.png

Ok, but 50 ohms is not going to make much diference really.  If the input is connected to +12V that's going to be 240 mA.  I use the diode clamp to prevent an ESD surge from reaching the chip inputs.  Fed into the power line means the capacitance of the power bus will absorb most of the surge.  The devices themselves typically have ESD diodes into the power rails, so in reality, the added diodes are just protecting the on chip diodes. 
Rick C.  --  Puerto Rico is not a country... It's part of the USA
  - Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
  - Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
The following users thanked this post: copper2000

Online pcprogrammerTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3706
  • Country: nl
Re: Hantek DSO2xxx schematics
« Reply #56 on: December 29, 2022, 07:04:50 am »
And that is why the manual of the scope states that the allowed voltage on the trigger input is 0 - 3.3V only.

Quote
External: External trigger input, it is on the front panel of the oscilloscope. The external trigger signal must be a 0-3.3V [CMOS] waveform.

Online DavidAlfa

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5907
  • Country: es
Re: Hantek DSO2xxx schematics
« Reply #57 on: December 29, 2022, 09:19:33 am »
but 50 ohms is not going to make much diference really

Really? The +-5V supplies have a load of about +600, -250mA.
Without resistor, a wire moves, the clip snaps, briefly touching 12V, but you have very low impedance path to +5V through the diode, being such small diode it'll will blow apart, and pray nothing else gets damaged.
With 50R in series, you'll have (12-5)/50=140mA max, the resistor will survive a quick "touch" instead destroying your frontend.
And if you hold the connection for longer, the resistor will dissipate ~1W, will act as a fuse, limiting the damage.
« Last Edit: December 29, 2022, 09:23:05 am by DavidAlfa »
Hantek DSO2x1x            Drive        FAQ          DON'T BUY HANTEK! (Aka HALF-MADE)
Stm32 Soldering FW      Forum      Github      Donate
 
The following users thanked this post: copper2000

Offline gnuarm

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2218
  • Country: pr
Re: Hantek DSO2xxx schematics
« Reply #58 on: December 31, 2022, 08:17:33 pm »
Quote
destroying your frontend

Thank you for making my case.
Rick C.  --  Puerto Rico is not a country... It's part of the USA
  - Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
  - Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 

Offline enot

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 1
  • Country: bb
Re: Hantek DSO2xxx schematics
« Reply #59 on: March 02, 2023, 10:01:26 am »
I drew a diagram of the power supply (new type, Batch202207)
 
The following users thanked this post: morgan_flint, pcprogrammer, copper2000

Offline eurotips

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Country: pl
Re: Hantek DSO2xxx schematics
« Reply #60 on: December 09, 2023, 07:40:52 pm »
The TR signal in power supply adapter is the synchronization with the AC network.  I would like to power scope from a LiPo battery. Is it necessary ?
 

Online morgan_flint

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 94
  • Country: es
Re: Hantek DSO2xxx schematics
« Reply #61 on: March 22, 2024, 10:25:38 am »
The TR signal in power supply adapter is the synchronization with the AC network.  I would like to power scope from a LiPo battery. Is it necessary ?
Probably not, but read here
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf