| Products > Test Equipment |
| Rigol DG1022Z or Siglent sdg1032x |
| (1/8) > >> |
| rauldm:
I search a new AWG with 2 channels, the maximum frequency is not determinant factor for me, I repair power electronics, test of automotive sensors and I do some things with arduino or pic. I see specifications of two equipments, Rigol DG1022Z and Siglent sdg1032x, just similar, The Rigol is probable more powerful, but Siglent display is better. The specifications are a thing but, the on field performance is the final veredict, anyone have experience with these devices? |
| tautech:
All SDG1032X we have in the field are running fine and customers seem pretty happy with their capabilities....even the few hacked ones I know of. :-X Not had one once of problems with any here in NZ. |
| nctnico:
Did you consider the Feeltech FY6900? From a functional point of view it can do the same as the generators you are considering but at a much lower price. |
| 2N3055:
Actually if you need square waves and pulses SDG1032X has much better performance.. Rigol has longer AWG memory.. They are both worth the money, but each has edge in some functions.. For general use as siggen, I would go with SDG1032X because of dedicated pulse generation and faster edges.. |
| rauldm:
ok thanks for your help, on arbitrary waveform is very important the memory? I have a Agilent dsox2002a with 1M of memory, for example if I get the waveform from oscilloscope on csv format, I can generate this waveform with in every AWG right? For example in the rigol can hack and get even more memory, on siglent with hack can extend memory? it has just same memory than my 33120a, I think for waveforms created on software the memory is not important, but for direct capture from oscilloscope, the memory is very important I´m wrong? |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |