| Products > Test Equipment |
| Rigol DHO914S vs Siglent SDS1104X-E hands-on (I have both) |
| << < (7/10) > >> |
| asmi:
--- Quote from: tautech on October 18, 2023, 08:46:25 pm ---Yeah comparing webservers in touch screen scopes vs normal scopes is like apples vs oranges, they are quite different and require different engineering/programming solutions for usable functionality. --- End quote --- Yes, and touch interface works much better in web. --- Quote from: tautech on October 18, 2023, 08:46:25 pm ---Then we have the situation of a 2017 vs 2023 design...... --- End quote --- That is manufacturer's problem, not customer's. |
| asmi:
--- Quote from: KungFuJosh on October 18, 2023, 08:37:44 pm ---That's a comically poor attitude. --- End quote --- That's the reality. Making interface as user-friendly as possible is a manufacturer's problem, not user's. --- Quote from: KungFuJosh on October 18, 2023, 08:37:44 pm ---That's like saying that my lack of skill with an oscilloscope is Siglent's fault. I can't follow the logic there. --- End quote --- Yep, you got it right. If Siglent devices suck so bad that you need to read a manual to use even basic functions, it's place is in the trash bin. |
| tautech:
--- Quote from: asmi on October 18, 2023, 10:38:42 pm --- --- Quote from: tautech on October 18, 2023, 08:46:25 pm ---Then we have the situation of a 2017 vs 2023 design...... --- End quote --- That is manufacturer's problem, not customer's. --- End quote --- How can that be ? 2 different UI's and physical designs and 2 different webservers < they can never be expected to work the same. The HW sets what is possible with SW. |
| Fungus:
--- Quote from: KungFuJosh on October 18, 2023, 10:28:27 pm ---Correct, and then it was explained. 🤷 --- End quote --- And apparently I'm the only one who thinks that shouldn't need explaining, that it's badly designed if it does. Oh, well. |
| KungFuJosh:
--- Quote from: Fungus on October 18, 2023, 11:03:37 pm --- --- Quote from: KungFuJosh on October 18, 2023, 10:28:27 pm ---Correct, and then it was explained. 🤷 --- End quote --- And apparently I'm the only one who thinks that shouldn't need explaining, that it's badly designed if it does. Oh, well. --- End quote --- Well, for one thing, the issue is a screen resolution / browser thing. I agree with you that the dated design of the 2017 scope could be improved, but if a person has an issue using different browsers and that browser's basic functionality, you can't assume the scope manufacturer will cover all those bases. In the end it's a lazy argument because you and I prefer different scope brands. My SDS2504XP web interface is significantly better, but it's a newer, more expensive touch-screen scope. I do get where you're coming from though, because my hate for rigol was birthed from the 1054Z and it's terrible interface/web console. Obviously the newer stuff gets, the better it is, from both brands. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |