Products > Test Equipment
Ridiculously small Rigol DS1000z series font size
<< < (12/35) > >>
pa3bca:

--- Quote from: marmad on November 29, 2014, 01:21:03 am ---
--- Quote from: pa3bca on November 28, 2014, 10:49:42 pm ---Certainly does not look washed out, on the contrary, it looks crisp and sharp to me (although a bit small  :) )

--- End quote ---

I disagree. Even in your photos, I think it looks slightly less sharp and washed out compared to the DS2000 screen. But maybe I'm just more picky about my screens,  ;)

--- End quote ---

Well I agree that the 2072 display is sharper than the 1074Z. But I still would not say that the 1074Z's screen looks washed out.. But that is a matter of opinion of course (Or I have an extraordinary god 1072Z specimen here)...
IanJ:

--- Quote from: marmad on November 28, 2014, 09:31:55 pm ---
--- Quote from: i4004 on November 28, 2014, 09:10:39 pm ---a close inspection of a cellphone image?  :scared:

--- End quote ---

What are you talking about? It's a camera on a tripod - which is visible in the image. It seems as if you like to be regularly wrong about things, no?

But it's difficult to take a photo with equivalent intensity when they're stacked, due to the LCD viewing angles.

--- End quote ---

Pull the camera further back, say across the room.......then use the zoom on your camera.

Ian.
marmad:

--- Quote from: pa3bca on November 29, 2014, 01:42:23 pm ---Well I agree that the 2072 display is sharper than the 1074Z. But I still would not say that the 1074Z's screen looks washed out.. But that is a matter of opinion of course (Or I have an extraordinary god 1072Z specimen here)...

--- End quote ---

I guess it's how you define "washed out". For me, it means blacks that are not black and whites that are not white, which the DS1000Z clearly suffers from (as shown in my previous post).


--- Quote from: IanJ on November 29, 2014, 02:03:02 pm ---Pull the camera further back, say across the room.......then use the zoom on your camera.

--- End quote ---

Yes, I know - unfortunately, I only have so much time in the day to devote to posting things here, and 5 minutes was all I had at that moment.
pa3bca:

--- Quote from: IanJ on November 29, 2014, 02:03:02 pm ---Pull the camera further back, say across the room.......then use the zoom on your camera.
Ian.

--- End quote ---
You will have to use a very good (and thus expensive > 2K$) telelens an a high Mpx camera if you want the individual pixes to show up on the photo from "across the room"
So, not a good idea.
Better take individual pics and control all settings., positions and ambient lighting.
pa3bca:

--- Quote from: marmad on November 29, 2014, 02:19:27 pm ---I guess it's how you define "washed out". For me, it means blacks that are not black and whites that are not white, which the DS1000Z clearly suffers from (as shown in my previous post).

--- End quote ---
But I do not see that kind of issue on my 1074Z, the blacks and whites of the 1072Z are not very different from the 2072. Also my closeups do not show "whitened" black and "blackened" white.. At least I do not see this.
What I do see is that the pixels themselves are a bit more fuzzy on the 1072Z. But closer inspection suggests that is entirely because the pixels are smaller and thus get more blurred by the screen (in front of the pixels)
The 1074Z is also a bit brighter, which may also contribute to the fuzzier look on my closeups.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod