| Products > Test Equipment |
| Ridiculously small Rigol DS1000z series font size |
| << < (14/35) > >> |
| nuno:
If someone has a solution for the ergonomics' issues please post :) |
| pa3bca:
--- Quote from: marmad on November 29, 2014, 03:48:59 pm --- --- Quote from: pa3bca on November 29, 2014, 03:35:21 pm ---Not necessarily a contradiction. I still think it is sharp (enough), but not as sharp as on the 2072. --- End quote --- Perhaps. But also perhaps picking nits. ;) I'll remind you that my original post which prompted this round of arguing and photo investigation merely stated: --- Quote from: marmad on November 28, 2014, 03:08:32 pm ---(the DS1000Z)...seems a little bit less sharp (although that might just be an optical illusion due to it's smaller size). ...due to the (camera) viewing angle...the DS1000Z screen looks slightly more washed-out than normal --- End quote --- --- End quote --- So after much arguing and photographing we may have come to some consensus :) : - the 1074 is smaller (duh) - the 1074 looks (a bit more) washed out, mostly due to the green subpixels leaking - the 1074 looks a bit less sharp because of a combination of (smaller) pixelsize and distortion of the glass in front of the pixels, and _possibly_ because of the different subpixel configuration -and pa3bca is still happy with the quality of the 1074Z's screen |
| marmad:
--- Quote from: pa3bca on November 29, 2014, 04:02:41 pm ---So after much arguing and photographing we may have come to some consensus :) : - the 1074 is smaller (duh) - the 1074 looks (a bit more) washed out, mostly due to the green subpixels leaking - the 1074 looks a bit less sharp because of a combination of (smaller) pixelsize and distortion of the glass in front of the pixels, and _possibly_ because of the different subpixel configuration -and pa3bca is still happy with the quality of the 1074Z's screen --- End quote --- Agreed :-+ |
| markone:
I would like to thank marmad and pa3bca for the effort spent on lcd panels analysis. The pa3bca macros confirmed my suspicions : the DS1000Z screen pixel sharpness is quite low, in mine opinion mainly due to its odd subpixel structure, that inevitably renders a blurred pixel contour. Judging from your photos, in my opinion the overall DS2000's screen readability is a lot better than DS1000Z one. In the mean time i found a way to reduce a little the eye fatigue with mine DS1074Z : shed some light with a table lamp directly on its screen. Still far from what i want, but enough for brief usage. |
| mamalala:
--- Quote from: pa3bca on November 29, 2014, 01:42:23 pm ---Well I agree that the 2072 display is sharper than the 1074Z. But I still would not say that the 1074Z's screen looks washed out.. But that is a matter of opinion of course (Or I have an extraordinary god 1072Z specimen here)... --- End quote --- From the images, it seems that the DS1000Z screen uses a different subpixel layout for the RGB triplets, and an alternating one at that. You can see that the thin lines appear jagged, in a regular zig-zag like pattern, while on the DS2000 screen they look straight and just dotted. This will likely contribute to the impression of a washed-out/blurry display when viewed at some normal distance, since the pixels for the lines appear to not be in the same row. Greetings, Chris |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |