I have only briefly played with the Rigol 2000, but I must say that I am pretty impressed.
On the surface it seems like the Rigol has the Agilent beat hands down in most areas.
A ton more memory, waveform reply, serial decode option (Agilent may include that in the future on the 2000X, the button is there), the lower noise floor and vertical ranges, Ethernet standard.
But the 2000X has a few advantages in terms of upgradability. The wavegen, the bandwidth, mixed signal digital, the hardware serial decoding (I think the Rigol is software decode, but have not confirmed), and 4 channel option.
One annoying feature of the Rigol is that when you move the waveform with the vertical position adjust, it just goes blank screen, and stays that way whenever you are turning the knob. Really annoying. Firmware bug perhaps?
If I was using my own money, and only needed a 2 channel scope, I'd get the Rigol, based on the big memory and the low noise performance alone. And it's cheaper.
And I get the feeling my review will end up with the same conclusion.
Agilent have very serious competition here, but the Agilent is still the clear winner in the education scope market.
Dave.