Products > Test Equipment
Rigol HDO1000 and HDO4000 12bit oscilloscopes launched in China
Martin72:
@rf-loop:
2.0
rf-loop:
--- Quote from: Martin72 on February 25, 2023, 05:14:19 pm ---@rf-loop:
2.0
--- End quote ---
Ok.
Later after Rigol tests etc when you have better time, I will ask you repeat exactly this same what you can see in my images and also as told about Sequence guaranteed speed measuring.
Just perfectly same signal input, including all same settings and then other scope looking SDS2kXHD Trig Out as in my image displayed. So we can see if this acquisition burst have any timing change. We can look it example here or other place so that this thread does not forked off into a side road
Martin72:
Hi,
Yep, can do, will do and then in the mentioned thread.
I need a second scope for this, it could be a sds2104X from work or ws422 when "repaired".
Or...A rigol HDO1074. ;)
Fungus:
--- Quote from: Martin72 on February 25, 2023, 06:42:06 pm ---Or...A rigol HDO1074. ;)
--- End quote ---
Sensible choice. :)
Martin72:
Here again in summary, my further impressions, part 2
What I liked was the speed of the scope, it was always pretty snappy no matter what was happening/being calculated on the screen.
The decoding was a bit bumpy at first, since the triggering has to be set pretty precisely to display plausible values, but then I liked the visual representation of the table better than with the Siglent, which rather "merges" with the background, because of the same color.
The idea with the sliding windows is great, but a bit tricky to use, especially if you want to move the windows so that they visually make sense.
The connection via LAN worked as I had imagined.
Overall, it's a good scope, but it could be even better if Rigol makes the effort this time and optimizes the software in the near future.
I don't really like comparisons, but there's no getting around it.
The model I had costs about 3200 € including taxes.
The comparison with the 2000X+HD is obvious, because it costs 3550€ incl. taxes and is the next 12 bit scope, after that it gets expensive(I know, I know...Owon...But please people...This is not a comparison, don't force me to prove it ;) ).
If I can spend 3200, I can spend 3550, so let's leave that little difference out of it.
Likewise, we can leave the screen size out of it, because they are the same size.
Both have 12 bit resolution and are very low noise, so we leave that out too.
What's left.
A comparison of the (imho) important key features:
DHO4000: 2000X HD:
- 1280x800 screenresolution - 1024x600
- 4GSa/s max. Samplerate - 2GSa/s max
- 800Mhz max bandwith - 500Mhz max
- 500Mpt max memory - 200Mpt max
- Hdmi output - No video output
- No MSO - MSO
- No Bode Plot - Bode Plot
- Active probe inputs - No active probe input
- No awg inbuild - Inbuild awg
In my opinion, however, you can only compare and then decide when the rigol has been optimized in terms of software.
I am somewhat branded by the MSO5000, which has not been optimized to this day.
Should rigol come to its senses and support the new scope accordingly, it would without question be a serious competitor, depending on what features you prefer.
At the moment it is not.
(And not for me anyway, since I need bode plot).
Thanks for reading, I'll make another post with links to some of my posts here.
And who knows, maybe I'll grab the DHO1000 and compare it to the 2000X+, I'm still thinking about it right now. ;)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version