Products > Test Equipment
R&S to launch MXO5
pdenisowski:
--- Quote from: nctnico on October 31, 2023, 02:41:14 pm ---Yeah, naming things can easely lead to heated discussions. At some customers I've seen products change names 3 or 4 times even after being introduced...
--- End quote ---
Fortunately, most of the really awful / unfortunate product names get filtered out before release.
Personally, I think the hassle involved in changing names after product introduction is usually not worth the benefit: I can't remember a time when we (R&S) have ever changed the name of a product after launch, but that might be because most of our product names are just three letter combinations :)
pdenisowski:
--- Quote from: jjoonathan on October 31, 2023, 02:50:47 pm ---Regarding FFTs, do they operate on an independent parallel stream of time-domain samples so that low RBW and long fft acquisition time does not necessarily force long time domain acquisition time? Or do FFTs operate downstream of time domain acquisition so low RBW requires long acquisition? In any case, they look slick. 12 bits and loads of FFT/sec really makes beautiful spectra!
--- End quote ---
One of the strengths of the MXO series is that the FFT settings are independent of the time domain settings. Here's a quick (1 min) explanation and demonstration from one of my team members:
We have lots and lots of experience with spectrum / frequency domain analysis at R&S :)
jjoonathan:
Even if you choose a good name, someone else can spoil it. Back in school, I had an interview at a pharma company called "Isis Pharmaceuticals." Between scheduling the interview and attending it, the ISIS terror group popped into the news cycle with their brutal execution videos. I didn't make the connection until the next time I looked at my schedule and had to do a double take, lol. When I asked them, the consensus was "yeah, we'll probably have to change the name," and shortly thereafter they did. They are now "Ionis Pharmaceuticals."
Sighound36:
Gentlemen, let us cut to the chase pricing would nice here :)
2N3055:
--- Quote from: pdenisowski on October 31, 2023, 02:55:18 pm ---
--- Quote from: jjoonathan on October 31, 2023, 02:50:47 pm ---Regarding FFTs, do they operate on an independent parallel stream of time-domain samples so that low RBW and long fft acquisition time does not necessarily force long time domain acquisition time? Or do FFTs operate downstream of time domain acquisition so low RBW requires long acquisition? In any case, they look slick. 12 bits and loads of FFT/sec really makes beautiful spectra!
--- End quote ---
One of the strengths of the MXO series is that the FFT settings are independent of the time domain settings. Here's a quick (1 min) explanation and demonstration from one of my team members:
We have lots and lots of experience with spectrum / frequency domain analysis at R&S :)
--- End quote ---
Does this mean sample rate and datastreams are independent (two different data pumps and streams)?
If that is so you could implement Frequency domain cross triggering. Now, that would be very nice...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version