Products > Test Equipment
Siglent SDS800X HD Review & Demonstration Thread
markone:
--- Quote from: Martin72 on May 11, 2024, 05:50:53 pm ---The RBW can only be achieved by manually setting the sample rate in the menu.
-snip
--- End quote ---
Not stupid at all, some automation in FFT settings would be more than welcome, direct RBW setting would be first in the list as well as a "blocking" mechanism for impossible parameters combination, simply to mimic a true SSA, putting the timebase setting as a "slave" parameter.
For instance, I hate a lot that when i loose the CF setting increasing the Timebase, as a consequence of this you have to re-set the CF manually, that is a huge PITA.
gf:
--- Quote from: markone on May 11, 2024, 04:03:55 pm ---1) link to compressed bin file 100MSa @ 2GSa/s (size is about 95MB) : https://file.io/su83ZcbhPr4d
--- End quote ---
Thank you!
I removed my previous post where I messed up the vertical scaling |O
I've also received a .bin file from Martin72, so I decided to plot them side by side with yours.
Attached are the corrected/updated plots.
The similarity is amazing, although it is not the same instrument.
For figure4, I did downsample with anti-aliasing filering (which the scope does not do).
Compared to figure3, some of the spurs disappear (those that fold down from 62.5...1000 Mhz to 0...62.5 Mhz in figure3).
KungFuJosh:
They both have SDG2000X AWGs as the source? That is crazy similar for the signals.
Martin72:
Yepp,
We have the same generator:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/sds800x-hd-review-demonstration-thread/msg5483791/#msg5483791
KungFuJosh:
--- Quote from: Martin72 on May 11, 2024, 10:38:00 pm ---We have the same generator:
--- End quote ---
I guess we all do lol.
Did you use the 3kXHD or the 800 for your results?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version