I'm surprised. Ever since Agilent's marketing department was successful in making wave update rate a key selling point, it appears that everyone and his dog is tracking down rare glitches. A higher waveform update rate is sometimes nice, but 5000 wfm/s is by no means slow. You should consider how often you would need the higher waveform update rate to track down glitches to other specs and features. No reason to discount it off-hand.
Not discounting it off hand. I just have a nasty habit of going over DSO spec sheets with a very fine toothed comb, due to past experience. In the case of the HMO30xx series, the update rate is 5000/s. OK. But the persistence delay is either zero, 50ms or infinity. Which means that any complex trace on the screen is at any given time crafted from the data of only 250 traces. Not sure what the result is for something like a complex, modulated RF carrier (video, AM). The one example shown in the manual isn't very convincing IMO.
Additionally, the scope appear to have a proper XYZ mode, complete with proper intensity modulation on the Z scale (great!). Yet when you consider your visible traces are always comprised of the 250 mentioned above, it really makes me wonder what the image quality of showing video might be, or not be. Again, the XY(Z) example in the manual is even less convincing than the modulated carrier, and the manual makes absolutely zero mention of the Z bandwidth. Tek could figure out 20+ years ago that some of us might be interested in that little detail...

tl;dr: I would need to do a lot more research here, to make certain I know what I would be buying, before I could decide on the Hameg.
PS: Yes, I know I am probably expecting too much if I am looking for a DSO, which could display video convincingly.
