I am really amazed by some of the things people say. Can anyone making a claim that $X dollars which is greater than, IMHO opinion, say $1.00 justify this empirically, using some math and science?
I don't remember the name of the place but there was a A/V Tech Store in Chicago that use to do a talk show on a A.M. station that use to convince people that they needed a $100 to $200 power cable to get the highest fidelity from their A/V equipment. I think they went out of business... well at least I listened as they were saying the would no longer be doing the show; they my still be in business.
I know a little bit about power. I know an understand the computations behind sizing cables. As I am always eager to learn, can someone explain to me via math, and say material sciences, exactly why you have to pay anything more than $1.00 for a power cable?
I have worked in extremely large computer labs, data centers, and networking environments. And the power cables that say Network Vendor A, B, C, and Computer Vendor A, B, C, all seem to run the equipment just fine; all generic power cables.
Can anyone do the math for me? I would like to know what I am missing. I think to be convincing the empirical proof should include stuff like stranded versus single conductor, resistivity of the conducting material, diameter of the conductors used, spacing between the conductors, number of conductors used, skin effect, etc. l would love to see that empirical proof; as it would completely disprove what I know and have learned.
To the OP. Go tell someone who is selling those $100 power cables that you would like to take one home and try it, comparing it to other cables, in your environment. Get then to stipulate that if you don't like it for any reason you can return it, after all it is a power cable, there is no wear and tear on it <laugh> right?... See if they'll go for that. Charlatans!!!