| Products > Test Equipment |
| Siglent - 11/20 - New SDS1104X-U, 4 channel 100MHz, 1Gsa/s economy oscilloscope |
| << < (4/32) > >> |
| ballen:
It's clear to me. This scope is designed to compete apples to apples with the Rigol 1054Z. It has effectively the same price and feature set. The Rigol has one ADC, this has one. The Rigol does not have 500uV/division, neither does this. The Rigol has no integrated web server, neither does this. And so on. |
| tautech:
--- Quote from: ballen on November 29, 2020, 07:06:50 am ---It's clear to me. This scope is designed to compete apples to apples with the Rigol 1054Z. It has effectively the same price and feature set. The Rigol has one ADC, this has one. The Rigol does not have 500uV/division, neither does this. The Rigol has no integrated web server, neither does this. And so on. --- End quote --- Nearly right. ;) SDS1104X-E was detuned to make the X-U that doesn't require hacking to provide 100 MHz BW. OTOH SDS1104/1204X-E is a 200 MHz platform. All do Dot mode correctly. :P |
| Fungus:
--- Quote from: Lowkus on November 28, 2020, 10:24:47 pm ---I'm in my 40's, I have an okay salary, at this point in life I value time more than money. If I purchase an SDS1204X-E ($760) or an SDS2104X Plus ($1400), over the course of several years would I save myself more than a week of wasted time compared to using an SDS1104X-U? Are the capabilities of the more expensive scopes going to have a significant impact on how long it takes me to debug problems in my circuits? --- End quote --- That depends on how complex your circuits are, obviously. If you can afford it and you feel this is an important decision then go straight for 2000-series. They can do more analysis of the signal, they have better FFTs, etc. The manufacturers deliberately leave things out of the lower models. Things like the touch screen of the 2000 will also save you loads of time in general use. |
| Fungus:
--- Quote from: ballen on November 29, 2020, 07:06:50 am ---It's clear to me. This scope is designed to compete apples to apples with the Rigol 1054Z. It has effectively the same price and feature set. The Rigol has one ADC, this has one. The Rigol does not have 500uV/division, neither does this. The Rigol has no integrated web server, neither does this. And so on. --- End quote --- It's still more expensive than the Rigol. If anything, this will take away sales from the Siglent SDS1104X-E. |
| 2N3055:
--- Quote from: ballen on November 29, 2020, 07:06:50 am ---It's clear to me. This scope is designed to compete apples to apples with the Rigol 1054Z. It has effectively the same price and feature set. The Rigol has one ADC, this has one. The Rigol does not have 500uV/division, neither does this. The Rigol has no integrated web server, neither does this. And so on. --- End quote --- Lets just ask few questions about new SDS1104X-U to Siglent experts. I don't have the scope so cannot test myself. 1. What can you do with segment/history frames. (Rigol cannot do any of this) -Can you play them back with persistence to get envelope of all captured frames ? -Can you decode from them ? -Can you enable measurements on history frames ? 2. Does it have Measurement trend (Rigol has that) 3. Does it have CAN/LIN (Rigol doesn't) 4. Does it measure over full captured data (Rigol doesn't) 5. Does it has better/faster msk test. Those are very useful sometimes. 6. Does it have detected peaks table in FFT? Is it sortable? (Rigol doesn't have it) 7. Does it have search function? What can it do? (Rigol has none) 8. Is 1mV/div real analog range. (Rigol has 1mV/div by zooming in software from 5mV/div) 9. Does it have color grading display? (It seems to does, Rigol doesn't) Potentially there is quite some difference. Also, for those who care, Siglent is more responsive to user input. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |