Products > Test Equipment

Siglent - 11/20 - New SDS1104X-U, 4 channel 100MHz, 1Gsa/s economy oscilloscope

<< < (10/32) > >>

2N3055:

--- Quote from: Elasia on November 29, 2020, 05:14:20 pm ---
--- Quote from: tv84 on November 29, 2020, 05:10:21 pm ---
--- Quote from: 2N3055 on November 29, 2020, 05:03:54 pm ---Did you document and share what you did (what steps are needed to install Samba on it) somewhere? For non Linux gurus..?

--- End quote ---

If Elasia creates the script I can pack it in an .ADS.

--- End quote ---

I swear you were standing behind me creeping...

--- End quote ---

 :-DD

EEVblog:
Apparently one is on the way to me. Wioll be interesting to see how stripped down the design is compared to the existing model.

EEVblog:
Comparison (from Siglent)

bdunham7:

--- Quote from: EEVblog on December 04, 2020, 04:20:53 am ---Apparently one is on the way to me. Wioll be interesting to see how stripped down the design is compared to the existing model.

--- End quote ---

Unless there's some quality issues somewhere as the result of the downgrade, I suspect most users won't even notice 99% of the time.  As in, if you had both, for most tasks you'd reach for the closest one and not bother taking 3 extra steps to get the 1104X-E.  But then again, they're only shaving $100 off a mid-design-cycle model that would be due for a price cut anyway at the first sign of serious competition. 

rf-loop:

--- Quote from: EEVblog on December 04, 2020, 04:25:54 am ---Comparison (from Siglent)

--- End quote ---

They have done bit sloppy work in compare tables. Also this kind of tables are not very useful because it do not expain any thing any deeper than just name, number and v or x.

Rigol FFT is totally wrong. Even when it may be still stated in some data sheets but - this kind of errors tell that they do not know competitors or comparable at all. In markets this kind of company need do they "homeworks" better for know others.
I do not know if this is absolute truth but I have seen notes that Rigol 1kZ have 64k FFT instead of 2k. So 64k and 128k not very big difference, just in same ballpark with 1:2. 1M and 2M they are  in different world.

Then V/div.  Of course if they tell Display scale 1mV/div and after then tell both, X-U and 1kZ have 1mV/div it is somehow ok.
Imho more important is what  real full resolution V/div. Good example is Keysight what may have 4mV/div lowest full resolution and after then 2 an 1mV/div are just digital zoom somewhere or even more just only display image vertical zoom.

Without any single this kind of detail these tables are nearly like nonsense.  Also need know truth instead of some obsolete data sheet values. I can still somewhere find fun numbers about Keysight BodePlot.

But Siglent X-U FFT is 128k (131072pts) and Rigol 1000Z 2k 64k (65536pts) afaik.
Only trump can live with lies.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod