| Products > Test Equipment |
| Siglent SDS1000X HD 12bit DSO's |
| << < (58/96) > >> |
| KungFuJosh:
--- Quote from: asmi on October 29, 2023, 11:12:20 pm ---consider that incident resolved. --- End quote --- I think you're the angriest Canadian on here. 😉 |
| asmi:
--- Quote from: 2N3055 on October 29, 2023, 11:07:14 pm ---You are rude and abrasive. And don't care much for facts and won't let the facts stand in a way of good insult. --- End quote --- I do care about facts, but you clearly don't. Otherwise you wouldn't beging praising the scope which didn't even came out yet :palm: --- Quote from: 2N3055 on October 29, 2023, 11:07:14 pm ---I didn't say it makes you stupid that you need/want only basic scope. But somehow you think you have right to call names people that want/need scope with more analytical capability. All manufacturers should be forbidden to make scopes that you don't approve of. Whoever makes or uses a scope differently than you think is appropriate is an idiot.. Quite narcissistic and egocentric way of thinking... --- End quote --- I don't care if you need all that fluff, what I don't agree with is your point that EVERYBODY needs this fluff, and one scope which has less BS features is somehow useless just because of that. --- Quote from: 2N3055 on October 29, 2023, 11:07:14 pm ---If anybody is shill and troll it is you. You are pushing inferior scope by Rigol in a topic that discusses incoming new Siglent scope and it's similarity to SDS2000X HD. Go sell Rigol somewhere else. --- End quote --- I'm not selling anything, nor I'm trying to convince Siglent shills to stop shilling - they obviously can't do that. I'm trying to bring some balance to discussion which otherwise is so one-sided that it's not even fully. Just look at the latest Rigol thread - there is some much Siglent shilling there, that sometimes I feel like it's not a thread about Rigol scope at all. And see even in this post you claim that Rigol scope is somehow inferior, even though I clearly see otherwise - cheaper, better screen, more bandwidth, faster and more responsive UI. Those things are what matters, not useless BS fluff that very few ever use. |
| asmi:
--- Quote from: KungFuJosh on October 29, 2023, 11:16:14 pm ---I think you're the angriest Canadian on here. 😉 --- End quote --- I'm not angry, I'm just tired reading all this shilling. |
| KungFuJosh:
--- Quote from: asmi on October 29, 2023, 11:23:15 pm ---shills --- End quote --- |
| 2N3055:
--- Quote from: asmi on October 29, 2023, 11:23:15 pm --- --- Quote from: 2N3055 on October 29, 2023, 11:07:14 pm ---You are rude and abrasive. And don't care much for facts and won't let the facts stand in a way of good insult. --- End quote --- I do care about facts, but you clearly don't. Otherwise you wouldn't beging praising the scope which didn't even came out yet :palm: --- Quote from: 2N3055 on October 29, 2023, 11:07:14 pm ---I didn't say it makes you stupid that you need/want only basic scope. But somehow you think you have right to call names people that want/need scope with more analytical capability. All manufacturers should be forbidden to make scopes that you don't approve of. Whoever makes or uses a scope differently than you think is appropriate is an idiot.. Quite narcissistic and egocentric way of thinking... --- End quote --- I don't care if you need all that fluff, what I don't agree with is your point that EVERYBODY needs this fluff, and one scope which has less BS features is somehow useless just because of that. --- Quote from: 2N3055 on October 29, 2023, 11:07:14 pm ---If anybody is shill and troll it is you. You are pushing inferior scope by Rigol in a topic that discusses incoming new Siglent scope and it's similarity to SDS2000X HD. Go sell Rigol somewhere else. --- End quote --- I'm not selling anything, nor I'm trying to convince Siglent shills to stop shilling - they obviously can't do that. I'm trying to bring some balance to discussion which otherwise is so one-sided that it's not even fully. Just look at the latest Rigol thread - there is some much Siglent shilling there, that sometimes I feel like it's not a thread about Rigol scope at all. And see even in this post you claim that Rigol scope is somehow inferior, even though I clearly see otherwise - cheaper, better screen, more bandwidth, faster and more responsive UI. Those things are what matters, not useless BS fluff that very few ever use. --- End quote --- It is called paranoia. Take the meds. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |