Products > Test Equipment
Siglent SDS1000X HD 12bit DSO's
2N3055:
--- Quote from: ojete on April 09, 2023, 07:34:46 am ---Martin72 you have the SDS2104X HD, after watching the quick guide of the SDS1000X can you say if everything is the same?
https://www.siglent.com/upload_file/document/SDS1000X%20HD_Quick%20Guide.pdf
--- End quote ---
What exactly is the question?
TopQuark:
--- Quote from: ojete on April 09, 2023, 07:34:46 am ---Martin72 you have the SDS2104X HD, after watching the quick guide of the SDS1000X can you say if everything is the same?
https://www.siglent.com/upload_file/document/SDS1000X%20HD_Quick%20Guide.pdf
--- End quote ---
I also own the SDS2000X HD and the SDS2000X Plus, and I read Chinese natively :P
TLDR is everything different has been pointed out already in the thread.
The exterior seems identical, besides the 1000 HD not having the AWG at the back, and uses a different connector for the digital probes.
Software wise everything looks very similar as well, the most obvious difference is the 1000 HD has 4 math channels, while the 2000 HD inexplicably only has 2 ::)
but tbh if the 1000 HD and the 2000X Plus are priced similarly, I'd go for the 2000X Plus without thinking.
Unless you are doing math with the traces all the time, or have to see the tiniest wiggle in the traces, 12-bit doesn't add that much tbh. The application that would benefit most from the two scenarios I mentioned is probably power electronics.
The noise performance of the 2000X Plus is plenty good, and 350/500MHz BW is more useful than 12 bit at 100/200MHz for "general use" IMO.
2N3055:
--- Quote from: TopQuark on April 09, 2023, 09:57:52 am ---
--- Quote from: ojete on April 09, 2023, 07:34:46 am ---Martin72 you have the SDS2104X HD, after watching the quick guide of the SDS1000X can you say if everything is the same?
https://www.siglent.com/upload_file/document/SDS1000X%20HD_Quick%20Guide.pdf
--- End quote ---
I also own the SDS2000X HD and the SDS2000X Plus, and I read Chinese natively :P
TLDR is everything different has been pointed out already in the thread.
The exterior seems identical, besides the 1000 HD not having the AWG at the back, and uses a different connector for the digital probes.
Software wise everything looks very similar as well, the most obvious difference is the 1000 HD has 4 math channels, while the 2000 HD inexplicably only has 2 ::)
but tbh if the 1000 HD and the 2000X Plus are priced similarly, I'd go for the 2000X Plus without thinking.
Unless you are doing math with the traces all the time, or have to see the tiniest wiggle in the traces, 12-bit doesn't add that much tbh. The application that would benefit most from the two scenarios I mentioned is probably power electronics.
The noise performance of the 2000X Plus is plenty good, and 350/500MHz BW is more useful than 12 bit at 100/200MHz for "general use" IMO.
--- End quote ---
Good analysis.
Raccoonhead:
It looks like a decision between Rigol HDO1000 and Siglent SDS1000X HD. I've always liked Siglent better, but I'm an impatient person and Rigol is now available.
ojete:
--- Quote from: TopQuark on April 09, 2023, 09:57:52 am ---
--- Quote from: ojete on April 09, 2023, 07:34:46 am ---Martin72 you have the SDS2104X HD, after watching the quick guide of the SDS1000X can you say if everything is the same?
https://www.siglent.com/upload_file/document/SDS1000X%20HD_Quick%20Guide.pdf
--- End quote ---
I also own the SDS2000X HD and the SDS2000X Plus, and I read Chinese natively :P
TLDR is everything different has been pointed out already in the thread.
The exterior seems identical, besides the 1000 HD not having the AWG at the back, and uses a different connector for the digital probes.
Software wise everything looks very similar as well, the most obvious difference is the 1000 HD has 4 math channels, while the 2000 HD inexplicably only has 2 ::)
but tbh if the 1000 HD and the 2000X Plus are priced similarly, I'd go for the 2000X Plus without thinking.
Unless you are doing math with the traces all the time, or have to see the tiniest wiggle in the traces, 12-bit doesn't add that much tbh. The application that would benefit most from the two scenarios I mentioned is probably power electronics.
The noise performance of the 2000X Plus is plenty good, and 350/500MHz BW is more useful than 12 bit at 100/200MHz for "general use" IMO.
--- End quote ---
Thank you so much. With the question I meant the software part.
Does anybody knows if the scope is already for sale in China?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version