Products > Test Equipment
Siglent SDS1000X HD versus SDS2000X HD
<< < (11/21) > >>
tautech:
EF, nice post and it does seem unusual the Mask test rate is so low in the datasheet (just checked) compared with other models.
However there is probably a partial workaround for the more simple waveforms in that SDS2000X HD provides for 2 user definable Zone triggers where when strategically placed and a Not Intersect property selected, using this instead of Mask could maintain a higher framerate.

Not tested and none in stock but others might contribute/clarify.
 
KungFuJosh:
I don't believe the 80,000 on the mask test. It's probably a typo.
tautech:

--- Quote from: KungFuJosh on March 28, 2024, 02:14:00 am ---I don't believe the 80,000 on the mask test. It's probably a typo.

--- End quote ---
SDS2000X Plus ?
It is high compared to some other models but matches the SDS7000A spec.
Electro Fan:

--- Quote from: tautech on March 28, 2024, 03:23:52 am ---
--- Quote from: KungFuJosh on March 28, 2024, 02:14:00 am ---I don't believe the 80,000 on the mask test. It's probably a typo.

--- End quote ---
SDS2000X Plus ?
It is high compared to some other models but matches the SDS7000A spec.

--- End quote ---

Maybe it was supposed to be 8,000?  Just a guess.
KungFuJosh:

--- Quote from: tautech on March 28, 2024, 03:23:52 am ---
--- Quote from: KungFuJosh on March 28, 2024, 02:14:00 am ---I don't believe the 80,000 on the mask test. It's probably a typo.

--- End quote ---
SDS2000X Plus ?
It is high compared to some other models but matches the SDS7000A spec.

--- End quote ---

No, 80,000 is what the docs say for the SDS800XHD. I find it hard to believe that a hardware accelerated function would be highest in the lowest model. That's not how hardware planning usually works. I also assume it was supposed to say 8,000.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod