Products > Test Equipment

Siglent SDS1000X HD versus SDS2000X HD

<< < (11/21) > >>

tautech:
EF, nice post and it does seem unusual the Mask test rate is so low in the datasheet (just checked) compared with other models.
However there is probably a partial workaround for the more simple waveforms in that SDS2000X HD provides for 2 user definable Zone triggers where when strategically placed and a Not Intersect property selected, using this instead of Mask could maintain a higher framerate.

Not tested and none in stock but others might contribute/clarify.
 

KungFuJosh:
I don't believe the 80,000 on the mask test. It's probably a typo.

tautech:

--- Quote from: KungFuJosh on March 28, 2024, 02:14:00 am ---I don't believe the 80,000 on the mask test. It's probably a typo.

--- End quote ---
SDS2000X Plus ?
It is high compared to some other models but matches the SDS7000A spec.

Electro Fan:

--- Quote from: tautech on March 28, 2024, 03:23:52 am ---
--- Quote from: KungFuJosh on March 28, 2024, 02:14:00 am ---I don't believe the 80,000 on the mask test. It's probably a typo.

--- End quote ---
SDS2000X Plus ?
It is high compared to some other models but matches the SDS7000A spec.

--- End quote ---

Maybe it was supposed to be 8,000?  Just a guess.

KungFuJosh:

--- Quote from: tautech on March 28, 2024, 03:23:52 am ---
--- Quote from: KungFuJosh on March 28, 2024, 02:14:00 am ---I don't believe the 80,000 on the mask test. It's probably a typo.

--- End quote ---
SDS2000X Plus ?
It is high compared to some other models but matches the SDS7000A spec.

--- End quote ---

No, 80,000 is what the docs say for the SDS800XHD. I find it hard to believe that a hardware accelerated function would be highest in the lowest model. That's not how hardware planning usually works. I also assume it was supposed to say 8,000.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod