| Products > Test Equipment |
| Siglent SDS1104X-E In-Depth Review |
| << < (29/48) > >> |
| tmbinc:
Also I'm still really, really curious if there's a Zynq in the SLA1016. Any teardown pics? :) |
| tv84:
--- Quote from: tmbinc on December 13, 2018, 12:00:01 am ---Also I'm still really, really curious if there's a Zynq in the SLA1016. Any teardown pics? :) --- End quote --- I think there is. Because the SLA1016 has a specific .ADS (with specific Product_ID) with code, FPGA, etc. |
| Performa01:
--- Quote from: kahuna0k on December 12, 2018, 11:01:20 pm --- --- Quote from: Performa01 on March 11, 2018, 12:59:09 am ---The first implementation of the MSO option has become available with firmware 7.6.1.20 and I’ve received the SLA1016 digital probe about a week ago. Unfortunately the Sbus cable was missing and even though the connectors are identical, an HDMI cable cannot replace it. So I have to wait until I get the original one. Until then, I’ll show some details of the hardware. First the contents of the box (minus the Sbus cable): --- End quote --- Did you finally got the SBUS cable and did the review of the SLA1016? I've been unable to find it in the thread. I'm thinking about getting it to be able to trigger on analog. I have a Digital Discovery (https://store.digilentinc.com/digital-discovery-portable-usb-logic-analyzer-and-digital-pattern-generator/) from Digilent that goes up to 800MS/s but is digital only. What's your opinon on the SLA1016? Thanks! --- End quote --- Well, I got the Sbus cable, but then I quickly found a couple issues and wanted to wait with the review until everything was fixed. Time passed by and some of my complaints just couldn't be addressed because of the given architecture (external device with its own intelligence, hence integration into the DSO isn't great). I got busy with other topics and the SLA1016 review got never completed. However I have posted some of the old material together with some comments here (Reply #1070): https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/siglent-sds1204x-e-released-for-domestic-markets-in-china/msg2007983/#msg2007983 |
| kahuna0k:
Thank you! According to the other post, those tests were done 9 months ago, do you know if: --- Quote ---Mixed channel Pattern Trigger is not supported, so it has to be either an analog or digital pattern. --- End quote --- is still true? If that is the case I'll pass, as that's probably the only advantage of the MSO I was looking for. For the rest of the things I prefer a USB LA. |
| Performa01:
--- Quote from: kahuna0k on December 13, 2018, 08:45:57 pm ---Thank you! According to the other post, those tests were done 9 months ago, do you know if: --- Quote ---Mixed channel Pattern Trigger is not supported, so it has to be either an analog or digital pattern. --- End quote --- is still true? If that is the case I'll pass, as that's probably the only advantage of the MSO I was looking for. For the rest of the things I prefer a USB LA. --- End quote --- It is still true, because the SLA1016 is an external device that has its own independant acquisition and trigger circuits. There is a means to synchronize the records so that the time relation between analog and digital is maintained, but with this architecture, the individual trigger circuits cannot have a high speed link with single digit nanosecond accuracy to implement a combined pattern trigger. While the combined analog/digital pattern trigger isn't available, the other advantages of an MSO over the LA are still there: - Real time screen display, high maximum waveform update rate - Time correlation between analog and digital However, together with the other limitations, I am glad that the concept of having an external device with its own intelligence is limited to the low cost entry level DSOs (X-E series). |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |