| Products > Test Equipment |
| Siglent SDS1000(X) / SDS2000(X) or LeCroy WaveAce (Blackfin) hacks? |
| << < (12/19) > >> |
| sn4k3:
--- Quote from: tautech on August 22, 2018, 08:35:02 pm ---SDS2kX series vs SDS1004X-E series 5x total memory (140 vs 28) 2x sampling rate 50 ohm inputs Probe sense Inbuilt AWG Trig IN/OUT rear BNC 8" display Much better MSO HW PAS SDS1004X-E More powerful processor Free Decode Small form factor Fast FFT Webserver and WiFi capable Updated UI .......that could be added to SDS2kX if Siglent wants to. 500uV/div @ full BW (no auto 20 MHz filter) Bode plot capable.....needs ext AWG or option module. --- End quote --- Now i have mixed fellings :-\ I was more inclined to SDS2kX, it have each chanel knobs instead have to switch and share same knob, larger, more memory, looks better and the other features that i like, but at 2x the cost of SDS1kX... From other side the SDS1kX is cheaper, newer, faster-cpu? Decoder, better UI maybe and all that for half the price. |
| tv84:
--- Quote from: oewean on August 22, 2018, 07:30:58 am ---BTW: As an distributor for Siglent I must warn about loss of warranty and the risk of destroying your scope.... --- End quote --- Of course, I respect and thank the warning. Although it was more appropriate when people went for the HW patch. For my part, a stock FW reflash and the device regains warranty. |
| tv84:
--- Quote from: KeBeNe on August 22, 2018, 06:44:32 pm ---patch worked without problems here --- End quote --- Did you observe any improvement regarding your previous measurements (before FW patch)? |
| tautech:
--- Quote from: sn4k3 on August 22, 2018, 08:57:25 pm --- --- Quote from: tautech on August 22, 2018, 08:35:02 pm ---SDS2kX series vs SDS1004X-E series 5x total memory (140 vs 28) 2x sampling rate 50 ohm inputs Probe sense Inbuilt AWG Trig IN/OUT rear BNC 8" display Much better MSO HW PAS SDS1004X-E More powerful processor Free Decode Small form factor Fast FFT Webserver and WiFi capable Updated UI .......that could be added to SDS2kX if Siglent wants to. 500uV/div @ full BW (no auto 20 MHz filter) Bode plot capable.....needs ext AWG or option module. --- End quote --- Now i have mixed fellings :-\ I was more inclined to SDS2kX, it have each chanel knobs instead have to switch and share same knob, larger, more memory, looks better and the other features that i like, but at 2x the cost of SDS1kX... From other side the SDS1kX is cheaper, newer, faster-cpu? Decoder, better UI maybe and all that for half the price. --- End quote --- I've had 2304 and later 2304X since 2013. I like X-E but for an everyday bench unit.......SDS2000X series. It's not a cheap entry level DSO so priced accordingly. Only the 300 MHz model comes with 300 MHz 10x only auto-sense probes and they are a very nice probe.....specify them if you buy a 2kX. I know....the $, but the perfect scope has not been built yet. The multiplexed channel controls are not something to be scared of and usage of them is adapted to quite quickly. For the UI, the great advantage is the channel tab indication of input attenuation settings. Siglent need to add this to all their current DSO models with the modern V2 UI. |
| tv84:
--- Quote from: tautech on August 22, 2018, 09:28:25 pm ---I've had 2304 and later 2304X since 2013. I like X-E but for an everyday bench unit.......SDS2000X series. --- End quote --- tautech, If I understand it correctly, you still prefer the SDS X instead of a X-E, since you already owned it. What is the thing that you most miss about the X-E in your day-to-day? And what is the thing (that the X-E doesn't have) that you most use in your day-to-day? |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |