| Products > Test Equipment |
| Sniffing the Rigol's internal I2C bus |
| << < (571/899) > >> |
| mrflibble:
--- Quote from: johna on February 04, 2014, 08:49:35 am ---My test was on unhacked unit. And you are right - "doesn't work as expected" is not a bug, but if you do not have decode on recorded data the decoding option is not worth the money. And I was about to buy the decoding option before I try to hack it ... because well if they did a great job, they deserve the money. But I tried the trial option and I was not quite happy with it. Decoding seams to be there for the marketing - just an answer to Agilent's decoding option. --- End quote --- Mmmh? I recall reading about the 1000z/2000 series that they can do protocol decoding on both live and recorded data. Or maybe I didn't understand it correctly? |
| tiagobaracho:
Guys... I had the 200mhz serial installer ... I generated the 300mhz serial NS8H and installed.... now it shows two lines .. one for the 200mhz and another for the 300 mhz.... Is it wrong ? should i uninstall all options and install the 300 mhz serial again? I have windows 7.... how do i uninstall ? is there any command to use on the sigma ? Thanks very much |
| tiagobaracho:
I was thinking about an way to test around 200-300 mhz ( i don have anything to generate)... Is there any settings on the scope that we can chose a fixed frequency to scan ?Because if it have, we could be able to see the bandwidth up to 300mhz... |
| neslekkim:
--- Quote from: tiagobaracho on February 04, 2014, 02:14:29 pm ---Guys... I had the 200mhz serial installer ... I generated the 300mhz serial NS8H and installed.... now it shows two lines .. one for the 200mhz and another for the 300 mhz.... Is it wrong ? should i uninstall all options and install the 300 mhz serial again? I have windows 7.... how do i uninstall ? is there any command to use on the sigma ? Thanks very much --- End quote --- Try some google.. https://www.google.com/search?q=rigol+uninstall+site%3Aeevblog.com#q=rigol+uninstall+site:eevblog.com%2Fforum%2F |
| diyaudio:
--- Quote from: mrflibble on February 04, 2014, 01:21:34 pm --- --- Quote from: johna on February 04, 2014, 08:49:35 am ---My test was on unhacked unit. And you are right - "doesn't work as expected" is not a bug, but if you do not have decode on recorded data the decoding option is not worth the money. And I was about to buy the decoding option before I try to hack it ... because well if they did a great job, they deserve the money. But I tried the trial option and I was not quite happy with it. Decoding seams to be there for the marketing - just an answer to Agilent's decoding option. --- End quote --- Mmmh? I recall reading about the 1000z/2000 series that they can do protocol decoding on both live and recorded data. Or maybe I didn't understand it correctly? --- End quote --- This have been on my mind for a while now as well, I don't use the more advance protocols like CAN ect but its not the first time I see this heer is one video where someone experience decoding issues. The cost of one decoder can buy you a saleae 8-channel analyser, I never did trust a multifunctional instrument other than a reputable branded multimeter. I think we should create a dedicated thread around this . ? |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |