| Products > Test Equipment |
| Sniffing the Rigol's internal I2C bus |
| << < (590/899) > >> |
| asrc1978:
--- Quote from: stuartk on February 14, 2014, 06:16:03 pm ---I had a similar situation and I elected to uninstall my keys using the SCPI command " :SYSTem:OPTion:UNINSTall And then did a fresh instal with DSGH for 300 MHz with all options except 50 ohm Unfortunately I lost my serial number in the process..... --- End quote --- Hi Stuart, Mmmm, maybe a make a mistake because I made the licence code using DSHH option. On the other hand, to send a SCPI command; what port did you use? Thanks. BR, Seba. |
| stuartk:
--- Quote ---On the other hand, to send a SCPI command; what port did you use? --- End quote --- You have to right click on your scopes USB connection in the main window of Ultra-Sigma. I doubt the problem was with DSHH. It was likely due to installing several keys on on top of the other. |
| asrc1978:
Thanks Stuart! |
| asrc1978:
I applied the sentence ":SYSTem:OPTion:UNINSTall" through SCPI Panel Control using the following versions of software and the S/N don't change: NI VISA V5.4.0 Ultra Sigma V00.01.05.10 After it I generated and loaded a licence key using the code DSGH, now the "Installed Options" screen looks like the picture and the serial number is the same. Thanks again. Seba. |
| Mark_O:
I don't recall that anyone has ever reported that having all 3 BW's listed actually caused any operational problems? Just uses a bit more screen space, in the list. I.e., the scope isn't "confused" about it's "true identity", and behaves improperly. Does it? I'm just wondering why people care, unless there's a functional disadvantage I missed reading about. Always a possibility in this thread. (And yes, I'm aware of the potential issues that can arise, simply by enabling 300 MHz. And thus why it's not recommended.) |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |