| Products > Test Equipment |
| Sniffing the Rigol's internal I2C bus |
| << < (642/899) > >> |
| AndersAnd:
--- Quote from: ted572 on April 14, 2014, 12:26:51 pm ---5. Repeat Step 1. through 4. for each Option code (DSAC, DSAE, etc.). --- End quote --- No need to do this. Simply enter DSER as the only option code instead. DSER is all options without the 500µV. DSFR on the other hand has the buggy 500µV included as well, so only use DSER. DSER is not listed at the keygen website, but it still works. I think you should update you post with the guide to use DSER instead. And while you're at it, http://rigol.avotronics.co.uk/mirrors/riglol/ is just a mirror of the original keygen site http://riglol.3owl.com there's another mirror at http://gotroot.ca/rigol/riglol/ I think you shopuld mention all three sites (some have problems accessing http://riglol.3owl.com and the other sites might be down from time to time too, so better mention all 3: RigLol keygen: http://riglol.3owl.com Canadian mirror: http://gotroot.ca/rigol/riglol/ UK mirror: http://rigol.avotronics.co.uk/mirrors/riglol/ |
| icaro600:
Thanks alot PedrodaGr8 and Ted572¡¡. Just waiting for my DS1074Z, is comming¡¡¡ :-+ |
| hans:
--- Quote from: AndersAnd on April 14, 2014, 06:10:50 pm --- --- Quote from: ted572 on April 14, 2014, 12:26:51 pm ---5. Repeat Step 1. through 4. for each Option code (DSAC, DSAE, etc.). --- End quote --- No need to do this. Simply enter DSER as the only option code instead. DSER is all options without the 500µV. DSFR on the other hand has the buggy 500µV included as well, so only use DSER. DSER is not listed at the keygen website, but it still works. I think you should update you post with the guide to use DSER instead. --- End quote --- Indeed, that would have been nice... It's not listed on the page, and blindly entered the "All Options" option. I've tried the 500uV/div setting, and it is indeed very buggy. Now it's annoying to have the bugged range everytime I scroll back to minimum V/div. Is there any way to undo keys? My scope runs the SP5 firmware at this moment. |
| ted572:
Yes, this is off topic. I wanted to be sure we have an opportunity to get Rigol Service Guides/Manuals for the following: 1. DM3051,2,4,3061,2,4 Series, 2. DM3058, 3. DM3068, 4. DS1000D,E Series, and 5. DS4000. https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/rigol-service-manuals-where-to-find/msg426526/#msg426526 |
| alexwhittemore:
--- Quote from: thn788 on March 27, 2014, 10:05:03 pm ---Hi After reading in Suffer1981de's post about the DS1000Z firmware 00.02.03.SP5, I e-mailed my scope dealer and immediately received the new firmware. Although "new" is probably relative: seems to have been released on Jan. 26th, already. Haven't yet looked for changes or bug-fixes but noticed that the measurement menu on the left side has gained the 8 new measurements that are documented in the User Guide from Jan 2014, which is online on Rigol's website for quite some time, already. Here is a link to the firmware: http://www.filedropper.com/ds1000zupdate-v000203sp5 Have fun. :-) --- End quote --- This link seems dead. Does anyone have a working one? Is this update legit? EDIT: Also, I know that the 500µV/div option doesn't seem to work for anyone, but my understanding is that you can set it, but the signal is offset wrong. I enabled the option (or, at least, I fed it a code it took that should have), but I can't seem to go down that low, my lowest vertical setting is 500mV. Incidentally, that setting works. Oh. Duh. Probe attenuation factor. Set to 1, I see 500µV. Okay, so I've definitely noticed the problem where it flies off screen never to return, but depending on tongue angle it seems to work fine. That said, I don't think there's anything special going on here: I notice that, with my vertical at 500uV, the discrete ADC steps are clearly visible. They look to be about 60µV tall. When I switch to 1mV/div, I still see steps, about half as tall on screen, which is to say they still look to be 60µV tall. It seems that, in both 1mV and 500uV/div modes, the ADC is scaled to 15.36mV p-p full scale, which actually is close enough that it seems believable that the 2mV/div range is the lowest range where full scale is actually all 8 divisions on screen (and the descretization steps are actually 62.5µV and not 60 as I roughly measured with cursors). Not to say I'm too bummed out about that, a closer view is still helpful. But I don't think your input resolution is actually improving any when lower than 2mV/div, you're just seeing a digitally zoomed-in picture. If that's true, why not 200µV/div as well? Though at that point you'd only be seeing 3.2 steps per division, which would be almost more misleading than useful. EDIT again: By the same token, I kind of which I had a 1ns/div timebase setting. Though of course it'd only represent one sample per division. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |