EEVblog Electronics Community Forum
Products => Test Equipment => Topic started by: Plasmateur on January 05, 2023, 05:12:04 am
-
Hello,
I am using a MSO54 O-scope and a Siglent SDG6000X to test for an application where a small amplitude signal is buried in a large amplitude signal. The MSO54 has 8-bit, 12-bit, and up to 16-bit acquisition.
Considering I have the range of a channel on the O-scope set to +/- 5 Volts, then at 8-bits - the smallest digitized increment should be 10*2^-8 = 0.0390625 volts, about 40mV correct? - (I'm not considering ENOB here)
So I send two sinusoidal signals from the SDG6000X ARB in one channel of the MSO54 terminated at 50Ohm. Signal 1 is 5 Vpp and signal 2 is under 40mVpp. Because signal 2 is under the smallest digitized increment, I thought I shouldn't be able to see signal 2.
And yet when I used the FFT on the MSO54 I can still see signal 2 in the FFT, even down to 1mVpp. I'm confused as to why. Does the FFT on the MSO54 do something similar to a signal analyzer? I wouldn't think it did.
Perhaps it might have something to do with isolation of the channels on the SDG6000X? I tried many different configurations, but the small signal is still seen in the FFT. I'm not understanding why I see it there. Perhaps my knowledge of test equipment needs a bit of help.
If anyone knows why I might be seeing this, I'd love to know why.
Thanks.
-
It is hard to tell for sure without eliminating other setup issues, but one way I see this can happen is dithering. That small signal may be big enough to make large signal cross the bit threshold.
Imagine your large signal perfect with no noise at all and is just below the ADC count threshold. The ADC would read the constant value. Now add very small signal (or noise) on top of that. This is enough for the big signal to cross the threshold and be discriminated. And if the small signal is periodic, then this period would be clearly visible in the digitized data.
This is often used intentionally in DSP to reduce ADC quantization noise.
-
Hello,
I am using a MSO54 O-scope and a Siglent SDG6000X to test for an application where a small amplitude signal is buried in a large amplitude signal. The MSO54 has 8-bit, 12-bit, and up to 16-bit acquisition.
Considering I have the range of a channel on the O-scope set to +/- 5 Volts, then at 8-bits - the smallest digitized increment should be 10*2^-8 = 0.0390625 volts, about 40mV correct? - (I'm not considering ENOB here)
So I send two sinusoidal signals from the SDG6000X ARB in one channel of the MSO54 terminated at 50Ohm. Signal 1 is 5 Vpp and signal 2 is under 40mVpp. Because signal 2 is under the smallest digitized increment, I thought I shouldn't be able to see signal 2.
And yet when I used the FFT on the MSO54 I can still see signal 2 in the FFT, even down to 1mVpp. I'm confused as to why. Does the FFT on the MSO54 do something similar to a signal analyzer? I wouldn't think it did.
Perhaps it might have something to do with isolation of the channels on the SDG6000X? I tried many different configurations, but the small signal is still seen in the FFT. I'm not understanding why I see it there. Perhaps my knowledge of test equipment needs a bit of help.
If anyone knows why I might be seeing this, I'd love to know why.
Thanks.
It seems like you're also asking "Where Does FFT Process Gain Come From?"
https://www.designnews.com/aerospace/where-does-fft-process-gain-come (https://www.designnews.com/aerospace/where-does-fft-process-gain-come)
Using Google or Baidu you can find lot of answers.
This is mandatory to understand least partially:
https://www.analog.com/media/en/training-seminars/tutorials/MT-001.pdf (https://www.analog.com/media/en/training-seminars/tutorials/MT-001.pdf)
Also here in forum is some threads what handle these things directly or indirectly
Example here (FFT things):
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/comparison-between-siglent-sdg1000x-and-2000x/ (https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/comparison-between-siglent-sdg1000x-and-2000x/)
and here (FFT things):
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/siglent-sdg1032x-sine-distortion-at-1-khz/ (https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/siglent-sdg1032x-sine-distortion-at-1-khz/)
Keep always in mind that oscilloscope itself can also produce lot of "fake" signals what you can see when high FFT processing gain and it do not so much matter if brand is Tektronix, Siglent, Keyshitg, R&S ...etc.. or chungfunhang.
-
I could actually code this up and test it just for fun. Also going to look up - "DSP to reduce ADC quantization noise."
Very helpful response! Thank you so much!
-
Thank you for all of these links, diving in now.
-
Hello,
I am using a MSO54 O-scope and a Siglent SDG6000X to test for an application where a small amplitude signal is buried in a large amplitude signal. The MSO54 has 8-bit, 12-bit, and up to 16-bit acquisition.
Considering I have the range of a channel on the O-scope set to +/- 5 Volts, then at 8-bits - the smallest digitized increment should be 10*2^-8 = 0.0390625 volts, about 40mV correct? - (I'm not considering ENOB here)
Simplistic: With the FFT function you are also getting more bits. If you turn on high-res mode, you'll likely be able to see the signal as well if you use vertical zoom.