Products > Test Equipment

Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) group therapy thread

<< < (25137/27437) > >>

tggzzz:

--- Quote from: bd139 on July 07, 2022, 10:47:54 pm ---
--- Quote from: tggzzz on July 07, 2022, 10:26:24 pm ---
--- Quote from: bd139 on July 07, 2022, 10:11:40 am ---Most of the open source software out there hasn't had "the 2nd 90%" of the development effort expended.

--- End quote ---

FTFY.

--- End quote ---

Actually I am using notable bits of software recently that I actually can’t find any bugs in, do not break even once in a year or more of usage and actually solves the problem that I am trying to solve.

I’m waiting for someone to come along and fuck them up.

--- End quote ---

You must have taken some potent muscle brain relaxant. Patent it or become a distributor, as appropriate.

mnementh:
Oh dear... that does sound much like the early stages of "redhead infatuation syndrome".  :-DD

mnem
Somebody get the straitjacket...

Zoli:

--- Quote from: AVGresponding on July 07, 2022, 09:27:47 pm ---
--- Quote from: Zoli on July 07, 2022, 08:24:46 pm ---
Again, can you GUARANTEE that the readings what you've just done, stays within the specified limits for ALL specified conditions for ALL the manufactured DMM's(calibrated, OC)?
Because that's what the specification changes means.
--- End quote ---

Yes. It's not hard, the specified conditions are not unusual.

--- End quote ---
How nice of you to offering guarantees for Fluke; I' pretty sure they need it.

--- Quote from: AVGresponding on July 07, 2022, 09:27:47 pm ---
--- Quote from: Zoli on July 07, 2022, 08:24:46 pm ---And BTW, what is the required accuracy for "typical"? Old Trafford or playing field?
--- End quote ---

More like "Manchester" by the looks of it.

--- End quote ---
Still much better Molineux Stadium.

--- Quote from: AVGresponding on July 07, 2022, 09:27:47 pm ---
--- Quote from: Zoli on July 07, 2022, 08:24:46 pm ---Anyway, I'm getting tired of this discussion, never mind you've barking at the wrong tree; I strongly recommend to contact Fluke, and continue the discussion with them, since they are responsible to the issues you've raised.

--- End quote ---

Yes, I've often noticed people get tired of discussions once they've backed themselves into a corner.

I may raise the matter with Fluke, though frankly I suspect they will not care.

--- End quote ---
My conclusion of the whole discussion: common sense not that common anymore.
Now you can have the closing words.

Zoli:

--- Quote from: tggzzz on July 07, 2022, 11:00:57 pm ---
--- Quote from: bd139 on July 07, 2022, 10:47:54 pm ---
--- Quote from: tggzzz on July 07, 2022, 10:26:24 pm ---
--- Quote from: bd139 on July 07, 2022, 10:11:40 am ---Most of the open source software out there hasn't had "the 2nd 90%" of the development effort expended.

--- End quote ---

FTFY.

--- End quote ---

Actually I am using notable bits of software recently that I actually can’t find any bugs in, do not break even once in a year or more of usage and actually solves the problem that I am trying to solve.

I’m waiting for someone to come along and fuck them up.

--- End quote ---

You must have taken some potent muscle brain relaxant. Patent it or become a distributor, as appropriate.

--- End quote ---
Nah, is just the usual promotion of the current fruitty cargo cult.  :-DD :-DD :-DD
/ducks, then run like crazy

mnementh:
Zee plot; she zickensss... ::)


--- Quote --- Tekyard_Medical Rep -

I contacted eBay to ask how to deal with this; they started the dispute. What I didn't know was that once they'd done so, I wouldn't be able to speak with you on that platform.

Here's the problem: This unit had no screws in the case; it arrived held together by nothing but the bubble wrap. Once that was removed, the guts of the thing literally slid right out onto my bench by itself. There's no way your people handled this thing without the same thing happening, and the missing parts being VERY visible.

If you're telling me that the hospital lab this scope came from removed those parts before you got it, I'm sorry; I find that very difficult to believe. I find it much likelier that as you are in the business of selling this kind of gear, your people used the parts to fix another scope. Which is fine... as long as you disclose the missing parts before you put the remains up for sale.

I shouldn't have to ask if there are major INTERNAL parts missing; you described this as an oscilloscope, not 3/4 of an oscilloscope, or the shell of an oscilloscope with no guts in it.

You are in the business of selling this kind of stuff. The burden of accurate description is on you. It's right there in the eBay Terms of use. If you don't take the time to evaluate appropriately, you should expect people to not be satisfied.

When I have my return label, I will send this unit back exactly as I received it.

Thank you for your time,

mnem


Here's what happened
Jul 07
The seller approved your request
Jul 07
The seller sent you a message
Message

Hi, We listed this item "For parts and not working" and explain what we observed i.e. Lights come on but nothing appears on the screen. Missing handle. Since it's "For parts and not working" means it has issues or something is missing which we are unable to check and the buyer is responsible for the repair or he can take this unit for parts. You never requested us to send you a picture of the inside of the unit. It seems like you don't want to repair it and don't want to use it for parts. So, make sure the screen turns on when you'll ship back. For the future: You can ask for detailed pictures from us as we are re-sellers and don't have expertise in the equipment. To provide good customer service we are going to accept a return despite the fact we listed it for parts and not working.
--- End quote ---

mnem

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod