This popped up in my feed from one of my other Discords. Just a nice lazy Illegal FPV afternoon out in the middle of nowhere, over a public road where the worst you have to worry aboot is accidentally going down in a cow plop causing a car crash and getting locked up for manslaughter.
mnem
FTFY
Which you can also say aboot any one of the aircraft that has been your livelihood over the years. Or any of the gliders tggzzz flies. Or any kid with a fucking kite. Or even a spooked cow.
mnem
Yes, very true, but Robert is I think correct, and as far as I'm aware that the flying of drones in such places ie, near and across roads, airports, even built up areas and many other locations, is illegal in the UK.
Correct,
It's illegal to fly within 50 meters of a person or vehicle in the UK. There are exemptions when the person or object is under the control of the operator. There is some relief for sub 250g drones but there are still rules and despite the adverts and "specifications" there are few high perfomance drones that can actually meet the weight limit when fully equipped and carrying a camera. Flying near livestock is also a big no-no. As a farmer can shoot a dog worrying livestock, I'm sure thay would not get prosecuted for shooting down a drone.
*goes back and looks again*Yeah; you're right. Even judging against a typical GoPro's FOV, that guy couldn't have been at more than 20m altitude when he crossed over the road.
Dumbass. Sorry; I was looking at that vid through the lens of prior experience in the US, not current in the UK. mea culpa.
I didn't realize this was in the UK; for some reason, I was thinking NZ. Maybe because I was discussing Bruce Simpson the other day... under any circumstances, I don't know the current regulations in either, so moot point.
As for the US, at least when I was flying, I'm pretty that model aviation usage would have been considered normal for public lands. Most of the folks I flew FPV with were insured, as was I. The acro FPVers were among those pushing hardest in the community for people to get their AMA memberships and to actually go to model airfields, get some training and learn to fly responsibly instead of just showing up in gaggles at random locations. That stupidity, and the utterly idiotic pushback against
very obviously necessary regulation of the hobby, are the main reason I drifted away from it.
As for flying over highways: almost every registered model airfield I ever flew at had at least one public road in its registered flight radius; roads are not in and of themselves automatically a no fly zone for the purpose of model aviation.
There are literally hundreds of models of acro quads now under the 2 sticks rule (2 sticks of butter/250g) WITH both FPV and flight cams. Those also have a much lower mandatory flight ceiling, so I would expect to see them flying at these low altitudes,
tho not over a highway. Since the 2 sticks rule most of the Phantom morons are gone, thank Ifni. While it is still a hobby in its infancy, this stuff is getting better and better regulated every day; and
when I say better, I mean for both those who enjoy model aviation and innocent passers-by. It's sad that the day of dad and son casually flying 1-2m planks in the park are gone. But really, model aviation has been one of those activities that just kept getting overlooked by the authorities (at least, over here) for far too long; the
"self-regulating volunteer organization" that was the primary authority agency just wasn't doing the job anymore...
That fact is part of why I'm thinking of getting back into it; there are a lot of half-decent Acro Bind-&-Fly models out there, the FCs and FW are actually both getting "commodity product stable", and now that there are some actual concrete rules keeping the mail-order turnkey fuckwits out, it might be fun again.
mnem