| Products > Test Equipment |
| The attempt of a Micsig (A/S)TO11xx general purpose thread ... :-) |
| << < (20/20) |
| DaneLaw:
--- Quote from: Fungus on September 27, 2023, 01:56:57 pm ---This is a little program I wrote a while back for my Micsig. Normally the screenshots come out a bit dim when copied to the PC. I think the 'scope uses a different gamma curve for the screen or something. This program adjusts it so it looks better on PC. All you need to do is drag your screenshot files (.png format) onto this exe and it will fix them and save them under a new name (same as old name but with added underscore character). Hope somebody finds it useful... :) --- End quote --- Well done Fungus, You should show an example of your program "A vs B picture" :-+ // seems my system was the only one giving notice, so likely a false positive..(screensdumps of virus present sent to PM) Btw which Micsig scope do you got.? STO1104C? and what OTA-scope update are you on.? |
| electr_peter:
--- Quote from: DaneLaw on September 27, 2023, 07:53:45 am ---It looks like they simply forgot to put in the entry values for high & lowpass, which both have manual adj. control, and it will flood the screen with rubbish, and you need to dial in a value before it will play along. Can be seen at 1.05minute below on a STO1104C.. it gives a lot of nonsense.. --- End quote --- That confirms the filter bug, I see the same behaviour. With empty filter cut-off value nonsense is shown on a screen. --- Quote ---I reckon everybody has gone home at this Mc-Micsig-company and they simply don't give a flying d*uck.. but at least I can still slurp the vanilla ROM, back'ed in (xxx.08) which is solid...Micsig bandwidth filtering, and their gradings with CCT, were otherwise top nudge --- End quote --- I would day that Micsig is not that bad w.r.t. FW updates and is better than Rigol (DL3000 DC load has bugs and so much potential with better FW, but there is zero response so far :() There were quite a few Micsig updates, even recently (but just for small bugs IMO, as I didn't see change log anywhere). However, more serious requests for improvements are still on the table (like fine control, statistics trend, zoom bug, etc.). |
| Fungus:
--- Quote from: DaneLaw on September 27, 2023, 05:55:06 pm ---Well done Fungus, You should show an example of your program "A vs B picture" :-+ --- End quote --- Oh, duh! Screenshots added above... --- Quote from: DaneLaw on September 27, 2023, 05:55:06 pm ---Microsoft Defender (Antivirus) is not that fund of your program, but it goes without saying it can be a little hysteric at times, not least for homebuilt exe-programs. Btw which Micsig scope do you got.? STO1104C? and what OTA-scope update are you on.? --- End quote --- It's all my own code and I compiled it myself. MSD doesn't complain here... :-// What message do you get? Does it say it's a virus or just that it's "not a very common file" (or something like that). Mine's an STO1104C. |
| electr_peter:
--- Quote from: electr_peter on September 27, 2023, 07:00:19 pm --- --- Quote from: DaneLaw on September 27, 2023, 07:53:45 am ---It looks like they simply forgot to put in the entry values for high & lowpass, which both have manual adj. control, and it will flood the screen with rubbish, and you need to dial in a value before it will play along. Can be seen at 1.05minute below on a STO1104C.. it gives a lot of nonsense.. --- End quote --- That confirms the filter bug, I see the same behaviour. With empty filter cut-off value nonsense is shown on a screen. --- End quote --- Added screen shots with filter bug in previous post. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Previous page |