So, I'm attaching a number of pictures to show what I am talking about. The scope seems to be able to display a larger sampling on the scope as compared to smaller sampling on the ultrascope utility. I am hoping to find a way to have the more detailed FFT as seen on the internal display be put onto the computer for a deeper analysis. I'm not yet able to afford a good spectrum analyzer to supplement my equipment. I am just starting my electronics lab and am currently applying this in an audio setting, although my interests in electronics extend far beyond audio. So be gentle, this is my first oscilloscope.
As you can see, the ultrascope display for 25kHz is only 2ms, and above that it only shows half. But, as seen in the other images, the scope seems able to have data above that, with 100ms being 1MSa/s with 1Hz delta f, and it still collects and shows information above that point on the scope (it cannot do 2 seconds as it shows clear issues, and 1 second it starts to show a couple points I don't trust, meaning 500ms is the highest I would even attempt with this scope, although the 1M samples suggest 100ms may be the mark with this range (edit: 100ms if using the sample rate in the FFT section, if using the 1MSa/s in the horizontal box, that is 2s, and at 2s, there are aberrations in the data which makes me question it, but that means the 500ms should be well within range for usable data if that is what the manual meant by 1M samples)).
Any insight into why the PC software will not display the information would be greatly appreciated. I'm also open to scripts that can pull the data and have it usable, similar to the PyDSA for the Rigol DS1000 scopes. This is to examine distortion. Thanks in advance!