Author Topic: Thermometers  (Read 1124 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline German_EE

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2400
  • Country: de
« on: January 06, 2020, 07:31:39 pm »
I have five thermometers, this is not by design and is not a case of G.A.S., it's just that various pieces of gear have 'arrived' over the last year and most of them have the ability to measure temperature. The equipment is as follows:

1 x Philips bench DVM which uses a PT100 on the temperature range
2 x Aneng handheld multimeters that both use a K thermocouple
1 x Conrad LED thermometer with two PT100 sensors and two displayed channels

When the sensors are placed in an insulated container full of water and crushed ice I see various temperatures from -2C (one channel of the Conrad) to +3C (one of the Aneng meters). A second test using boiling water has a temperature spread of 4C but different devices read high and low. No device reads ice and boiling water to within 1 degree C.

Is there a better way of doing this or should I just resign myself to a world of relative measurements where any instrument has a +/- 2 degree C accuracy? Calibrating the Philips DVM is reasonably easy, I have no idea how to calibrate the two Aneng units and the Conrad unit has no adjustments.
Should you find yourself in a chronically leaking boat, energy devoted to changing vessels is likely to be more productive than energy devoted to patching leaks.

Warren Buffett

Offline ogden

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • !
  • Posts: 3208
  • Country: lv
Re: Thermometers
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2020, 07:48:25 pm »
Is there a better way of doing this
Sure. Get at least one digital thermometer (/w sensor) which is specified for accuracy you are looking for. Temp error of Aneng and Conrad seems to be well within specified tolerances of those instruments toys (0.5% DCV). Consider that generic low cost thermocouples usually have around +/- 2oC error as well.

Offline ciccio

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 647
  • Country: it
  • Designing analog audio since 1977
    • Oberon Electrophysics
Re: Thermometers
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2020, 07:57:43 pm »
The Philips should read more accurately than the others because a Pt100 sensor does not require cold junction compensation as for the thermocouple units.
I worked in the process control industry, and with a Pt100 a 0.2 °C accuracy was the norm, at ambient or near ambient temperature.
Ice+water+air are at the so called "triple point" of water, which is about 0 °C (but is pressure dependant) but in my opinion a standard Pt100 thermometer should read about 0 °C (not accounting for wire resitance from sensor to meter : in this case a 3 wire or 4 wire connection of the sensor may give a  more accurate measurements).
Using boiling water is not a good method, the water bubbles are more hot than the liquid, and this result in erratic meaurement, and there also is the effect of the different temperatures of the water "currents" flowing inside the container.
In the calibration labs it is a norm to use heated-cooled metal blocks (isothermal blocks)  where the sensor probes are inserterd (probes to be tested and a reference, calibrated probe).They tend to spread heat more efficently, and offer a thermal inertia reducing the oscillations in reading due to the above described sources.

Edit: I have two or three cheap Aneng meters: They measure randomly, even at ambient temperatures: errors of 5 °C are common, and the sensor probes differ widely one from the other... The cold juncion is, I believe, not calibrated: when shorting the input they should read ambient temperature, but this is not the case.

Best regards
« Last Edit: January 06, 2020, 08:03:52 pm by ciccio »

Strenua Nos Exercet Inertia
The following users thanked this post: radhaz

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo