Hi there!
I haven't had the time to go on with this topic in the last days but finally I can continue.
Pic 24: Spindle of a trimcap
Pic 25: unusual trimcapWhen inspecting the bottom of the PCB I found this little thing (Picture 24). It looked like some kind of fixture to me but there was nothing special on the upper side of the PCB but this strange little tube (Picture 25). Referring to the service manual this unusual construction is a kind of trimmer capacitor. Inside the tube is nothing but the spindle which has a slotted screwhead. I never saw such a "through hole" construction before and I am not sure why they could not use a standart type. There are several usual trimcaps on the PCB which clearly were not suitable for this job. Any ideas? My only guess would be they need a very special range of capacity at this place.
Pic 26: a bit of shieldingMaybe you realized it already: This device sports no real cans, only some very basic shielding of the hole unit. On the PCB there is only a small area "shielded" against or from the neighbour parts. There is no lid, only that "wall" (Picture 26). Obviously this is enough to do the job. Therefore I would call this a very good and stable circuit design. Inside is not much - some caps, some resistors, and transistors (BC107, BFQ12, BFW11). All the circuitry in the can is part of the x1/x10 input amplifier.
Pic 27: large diodes for input rectification
Pic 28: a big zener diode with colourful marking
Pic 29: Looking like torpedos, behaving like diodes
Pic 30: some shunt resistorsThe next pictures are just some component fun: There are some real big ass diodes for input rectification (Picture 27, Type BYX42-600). These cannot be found in the linked service manual! For the next revision which this document is for (PM 2422/A5) this section was rearranged and built with type BYX72-500.
Next is just a beautiful Zener Diode in the output section (Picture 28).
And some torpedos. Anyone else thinking of Super Mario Land? These are again some beefy Zener Diodes (Type BZX70-C12), I think for input protection as they are arranged head to head and connected between the active part of the shunt resistor ladder and ground.
The shunt resistors can be seen in picture 30. Beautiful, but by far not as impressive as the sovjet ones which were all but one in form of large coils.
Pic 31: only three real ICs
Pic 32: Overview of the tube driving sectionThere are only a few ICs in this device (Picture 31). They look much more like the ones we are used to today than the ones in the RFT unit did. Only the sockets look a bit crude by todays standards. But at least they are socketed! The ICs are:
- ADC (right, reference IC501) type FEY101B / S1. Could not find a datasheet for this thing.
- Quad Decade Counter/Register (middle, reference IC701), type FEJ271B.
- BCD to Decimal Decoder and Driver (left, reference IC702), type N74141AN.
Picture 32 gives an overview of the additional display driving circuitry for the tubes and decimalpoint, overrange and polarity handling.
Pic 33: A blob on a lead?
Pic 34: more blobs without leads. Jumpers![img]https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/vintage-teardown-philips-pm-2422-a-digital-bench-multimeter/?action=dlattach;attach=78732;image]/img]
Pic 35: production testpointsWhen I first saw the solderblobs on the board (Pictures 33 & 34) I did not recognize what they were good for. I thought they might some bad spots from producing the PCB. They are not - actually they are testpoints! Very common to use those solderbridges in todays SMD-circuits but I never saw this before in such an old device. They are labeled as jumpers and allow to get into or cut off parts of the circuit for ease of troubleshooting. Very nice Detail. The service manual shows a lot of testpoints and jumpers on the top of the PCB. They are ment for actual troubleshooting. But they also mention that there are testpoints on the bottom of the PCB. These are only ment for production testing but all clearly labeled and with reference in the service manual. I think that's how it schould be done: help anyone trying to repair a thing as much as possible by giving any information available. Would love to see that behaviour more often nowadays.
Well, I think that is enough for this device. I am amazed by the overall quality of this unit. There are some little problems and the obvious fail with the cap. Compared to the RFT G-1001.500 the distance between sovjet devices and those of the rest of the world at that time becomes quite obvious. The units give nearly exactly the same functions, ranges and accuracy. But remember, the Philips is five years older but yet looks way more modern. I would suspect the RFT to be of much more robust construction, even with it's mercury tube in it. And there are lots of places where there must have been brilliant engineers to make this thing work with the things available (think of the ADC built completely with basic OPamps and discrete circuitry) while in the philips state of the art components were available (ADC is just a single IC) and used. Like it was a different world...
But in the end - both work fine until today. What more can you expect? I love them both.
As always, comments, positive and negative criticism, and more information is very welcome. If anyone knows of the full service manual (without the other languages cut out) or one for the PM 2422/A4, please post a link.