Author Topic: Low R measurement on a DMM  (Read 5618 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AVGresponding

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4928
  • Country: england
  • Exploring Rabbit Holes Since The 1970s
Re: Low R measurement on a DMM
« Reply #25 on: March 30, 2023, 06:41:39 pm »
The meter I'm using is a Brymen BM869s but as it has mentioned even a 4W meter isn't suitable for this job.

Probably a hi-pot tester is the appropriate instrument for such measurements but unfortunately I can't afford one at the moment (they seem to go for over 1k) and secondly I don't feel very confident to use one as I've never done it before. AFAIK, you have to somehow discharge the DUT after the test and I have no idea how to do this. Also, although I appreciate the DIY recommendation I don't feel competent to to do it myself.

So, I was wondering whether a PAT tester would be sufficient. For some reason it's almost impossible to buy one in EU. It seems to be a UK thing. Searching around I found this one (which will set me back a bit over 500 euro) but I don't know anything about its quality and whether it makes sense to buy one. For example in a youtube video there's the following comment:

"I would love to know how this even qualifies as a PAT tester, it has a FAIL threshold of two Meg on a class one device according to the manual, yet the official threshold is one Meg. On a class two device it has a fail threshold of four Meg, when the the official threshold is two Meg, this all seems so very wrong when other testers are correctly calibrated, and this one seems to pass items other machines would fail."

https://www.firststopsafety.co.uk/product-page/memorypat-tester-with-display-and-memory

Are you confusing earth continuity tester (that tests that grounding wiring is low enough resistance) with an insulation meter (HI Pot that tests that insulation is proper i.e. very high resistance)?

That tester has both of these functions. It can test insulation leakage from live to ground with 500V applied, and separately with 150mA it can test that housing is connected to earthing on plug with low enough resistance..

As for insulation test, more is better .. few MΩ is already very low resistance...   If instrument threshold is 4MΩ and standard is 2MΩ it means tester is more rigorous than standard, which means it errors on the safe side... Which means it will show failed on some marginal devices that would PASS on strictly calibrated devices.

Problem is that even 4 MΩ is actually very bad insulation on most devices outside industrial environments.. 100W toroidal transformers i tested recently had resistance between primary/secondary in GΩ ranges. One that was outside in damp, salty, environment for 5+years was more than 50 MΩ still...

Heating elements in ovens/hobs etc can have quite low insulation resistances from cold, due to absorbed moisture. If it has a resistance of 100k or so it's a pass, and you're supposed to run it for a while before testing it again. I did fail one once and refused to turn it on; the measured insulation resistance was zero... don't think turning it on would have been a great idea. Was in a secondary school home ec lab...
nuqDaq yuch Dapol?
Addiction count: Agilent-AVO-BlackStar-Brymen-Chauvin Arnoux-Fluke-GenRad-Hameg-HP-Keithley-IsoTech-Mastech-Megger-Metrix-Micronta-Racal-RFL-Siglent-Solartron-Tektronix-Thurlby-Time Electronics-TTi-UniT
 
The following users thanked this post: 2N3055

Offline popeTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 370
  • Country: pl
Re: Low R measurement on a DMM
« Reply #26 on: March 31, 2023, 09:02:17 am »
Please can you explain what you are trying to do?
If low resistance PE to case and do not need to test to specification and have a power supply, Set current limit on power supply to 1A, connect the points you wish to test. Then measure the voltage drop with the Brymen. Thus use Ohms law to calculate resistance. Wire it 4 wire, which means that you connect to the measuring points, not to the power supply leads or clips. You can measure the power supply current as well to improve accuracy.

I build a fair amount of diy audio stuff with linear power supplies and I would like to be able to test for safety. Some of these devices are being used by other people too.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2023, 09:54:48 am by pope »
 

Offline AVGresponding

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4928
  • Country: england
  • Exploring Rabbit Holes Since The 1970s
Re: Low R measurement on a DMM
« Reply #27 on: March 31, 2023, 01:27:31 pm »
It's not often you see Class I audio gear, normally it's Class II..? At least in domestic settings, obviously pro grade stuff that goes on stage and tour will have a PE.

It does sort of sound like a PAT/ISITEE machine is what you need, if you're making Class I devices. An installation tester will do an insulation resistance test, but it won't be able to test the PE with any significant current. If you're making Class II devices, any insulation tester would be fine, I should think.
nuqDaq yuch Dapol?
Addiction count: Agilent-AVO-BlackStar-Brymen-Chauvin Arnoux-Fluke-GenRad-Hameg-HP-Keithley-IsoTech-Mastech-Megger-Metrix-Micronta-Racal-RFL-Siglent-Solartron-Tektronix-Thurlby-Time Electronics-TTi-UniT
 

Offline popeTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 370
  • Country: pl
Re: Low R measurement on a DMM
« Reply #28 on: April 01, 2023, 10:40:52 am »
It's not often you see Class I audio gear, normally it's Class II..? At least in domestic settings, obviously pro grade stuff that goes on stage and tour will have a PE.

It does sort of sound like a PAT/ISITEE machine is what you need, if you're making Class I devices. An installation tester will do an insulation resistance test, but it won't be able to test the PE with any significant current. If you're making Class II devices, any insulation tester would be fine, I should think.


As far as I'm concerned, almost all pro audio equipment has PE and in most cases it's class I. Definitely all the gear I make.

Don't quote me on this one, but I believe some PAT testers can be plugged on the mains and provide a significant higher current than the battery powered ones (?).

Tt least according to this video  (3:40) but this specific model seems to be discontinued.

« Last Edit: April 01, 2023, 11:10:12 am by pope »
 

Offline AVGresponding

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4928
  • Country: england
  • Exploring Rabbit Holes Since The 1970s
Re: Low R measurement on a DMM
« Reply #29 on: April 01, 2023, 12:10:05 pm »
It's not often you see Class I audio gear, normally it's Class II..? At least in domestic settings, obviously pro grade stuff that goes on stage and tour will have a PE.

It does sort of sound like a PAT/ISITEE machine is what you need, if you're making Class I devices. An installation tester will do an insulation resistance test, but it won't be able to test the PE with any significant current. If you're making Class II devices, any insulation tester would be fine, I should think.


As far as I'm concerned, almost all pro audio equipment has PE and in most cases it's class I. Definitely all the gear I make.

Don't quote me on this one, but I believe some PAT testers can be plugged on the mains and provide a significant higher current than the battery powered ones (?).

Tt least according to this video  (3:40) but this specific model seems to be discontinued.



Yes, the mains powered units can push up to 30A or so. Battery ones probably don't do any better than a couple of hundred mA, but I never use those so couldn't say for sure.

Do you need a new unit? There's plenty on the used market, though I expect shipping on a mains one would be a bit dear; they're all quite heavy due to their big transformers.

If you do have to buy new, Seaward, Kewtech, Martindale, Megger, are all quite expensive brands. Not sure if Robin are still around, but I believe Uni-T make these now, and there are probably other Chinese tier 2 brands at it.
nuqDaq yuch Dapol?
Addiction count: Agilent-AVO-BlackStar-Brymen-Chauvin Arnoux-Fluke-GenRad-Hameg-HP-Keithley-IsoTech-Mastech-Megger-Metrix-Micronta-Racal-RFL-Siglent-Solartron-Tektronix-Thurlby-Time Electronics-TTi-UniT
 

Offline PushUp

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 189
  • Country: de
Re: Low R measurement on a DMM
« Reply #30 on: April 03, 2023, 06:10:54 pm »
This topic is too big, to write it down in one sentence, because anyone should have a pat tester: I couldn't believe it myself, how many electrical things in my household are rubbish and does not stand the simple PE test - and here comes another one, which I have used daily so far with my computer, as it runs without a problem: My first DJMixer!

Just as an example: This DJMixer, which is Class 1, does not stand the PE test, thus it is not save to use any longer and needs a check up!

Good to see, that both of my pat testers are showing the same values:

The Metratester 5+ (the black power outlet is only for testing purposes without mains, the white is with mains)





The Secutest Pro gives you two possibilities: The "Red Ring" is for one of several automatic test sequences such as the EN62368 for instance with saved limits, here: less than 100mOhm. When the result is above the limit and therefore not shown in green but red, you have to abort the test and cannot go any further (if you want to pay an extra sum, GMC sells you the ability to bypass this, to go any further). I could change the limit, to bypass this, but does not want to, as it is not save and correct to do so...

However, the "Green Ring" is the manual test of the Secutest Pro, which can be compared with the "Metratester 5+" itself. No measured value is coloured in "green" or "red", but simply "white" and you have to estimate the result on your own or whether you want to test any further...






There are special European Norms for testing Audio-Equipment EN62368 and EN62911 (production line) together with the known EN50678 (after repair) and EN50699 (recurrent tests):






The "Gossen Metrawatt Metratester 5+" is simple to use and has all you need. I was also able to play with a Fluke 6500-2 (therefore I know the differences to the Fluke 6200-2), I owned a "Benning ST 725" (which is and has several clones), which I sold a month ago and finally bought a used "Gossen Metrawatt Secutest Pro" for my private use, as I love testgear...  :-DMM

PS and only as a short note: My "Secutest Pro" has a successor called "Secutest ST Pro", with the newest "European Norms" already included, but as I paid for the update "EN50678/EN50699/EN62368/EN62911" to also use automatic sequences, mine is now identical to the ST-Version, so that I only refer to my unit, as there are too many other things to consider with locked and unlocked Firmware-Features as mentioned above to bypass a negative test for example...


However, the most important things are:

1. different countries may have different limiting values, allthough the test equipment is the same brand and model

2. some pat testers have no automatic test sequence (Metratester 5+) and other units have both possibilities (Secutest Pro)

3. some pat testers can only measure with 500V (Fluke 6200-2), but other units are also able to measure with 250V (Fluke 6500-2, Benning ST 725) or the way you want from 50V to 500V (Secutest Pro), to treat sensitive components with care





4. any pat tester has to measure with at least +200mA (Benning ST 725), but only some units are also able to measure with 10A (Fluke 6200-2, Fluke 6500-2) and some are also able to measure with +200mADC, -200mADC, +/-200mADC, 200mAAC and 10AAC (Secutest Pro)





5. some units have no internal clock (Fluke 6200-2), others have (Benning ST 725) and other units even have a build in database to save and document any measurement for later usage and documentation with time and date and serial number of any equipment and so on... (Fluke 6500-2, Secutest Pro)

6. with an additional piece of software IZYTRON.IQ, you can even build your own personal test sequence the way you like (Secutest Pro)



Cheers!  ;)
 
The following users thanked this post: SilverSolder, 2N3055, alm, pope

Offline PushUp

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 189
  • Country: de
Re: Low R measurement on a DMM
« Reply #31 on: April 04, 2023, 10:17:32 am »
As my DJMixer is +30 years old, I was surprised, that the power cord with its poor quality, togteher with a bad earthing point, was the reason for the bad PE resistance test. After solving these issues, I can now show the rest of the EN62368 testing procedure, since the value is now smaller than 100mOhm...

Manual measurement of R PE - showing no limit:




..., before starting the auto test sequence EN62368, so that you know, that it will most likely succeed...


R PE - now with limit:




I PE AC NL & DC NL:




I PE AC LN & DC LN:




Function test:




Summary of the result:





Cheers!  ;)
 
The following users thanked this post: nctnico, 2N3055, alm

Offline popeTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 370
  • Country: pl
Re: Low R measurement on a DMM
« Reply #32 on: April 04, 2023, 10:21:56 am »
Thank you PushUp  :-+

Very informative post.

However, I'm afraid that all the recommended options are a bit out of my budget for the time being....  :-\ 

I keep looking for a decent and more affordable solution though.
 

Online 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7463
  • Country: hr
Re: Low R measurement on a DMM
« Reply #33 on: April 04, 2023, 11:10:13 am »
"Just hard work is not enough - it must be applied sensibly."
Dr. Richard W. Hamming
 

Offline PushUp

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 189
  • Country: de
Re: Low R measurement on a DMM
« Reply #34 on: April 06, 2023, 11:34:19 am »
Yes, money is always the decisive factor! However, even more important is the wording: Don't save at the wrong end! "In german we say: Nicht am verkehrten Ende sparen!"

My example: As I wanted to save money I bought the cheap ZD-915 desoldering station from a german reseller for about 80 Euro. You cannot expect any build quality for this price, BUT you should at least expect promised material with 0.75mm² copper inside, to ensure safety. I have never ever seen such a bad PE resistance for such a short length of power cord shipped with this package...

With this power cable it is impossible to pass any test and this does prove, that any sticker, which should guarantee safety is bullshit! The cable is marked 0.75mm², but this cannot be the case with 315mOhm:




When something goes wrong, it is always a chain of unhappy circumstances, but when it happens, you would like to be on the safe side!

This power cord is from my Weller Solder Station and has the same length and thickness, but only 72mOhm:




A cheaper possibility to be on the safe side, is to use an Insulation Tester. However, this testgear measures with +300mA (here: 312,1mA) in the low Ohm setting, so that I don't know, if this is still OK, when it comes to a problem or an accident with your audio equipment:




My piece of copper is so thick, that is has a good connection inside the plug and does not play any role as I wiggled around to get a good connection point. Compared to the 315mOhm from above 320mOhm is a good hint, that the values are at least plausible and therefore right:




...and just as a comparison, that it is always better to build your own power cables with 1.5mm² thickness: This testing cable is 6m long, has a switch, a power outlet, 1m long testleads and several wago inside, together with the usual spring connection points and has only 74mOhm:






Cheers!  ;)
 

Offline modoran

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 72
  • Country: ro
Re: Low R measurement on a DMM
« Reply #35 on: April 06, 2023, 03:48:48 pm »


With this power cable it is impossible to pass any test and this does prove, that any sticker, which should guarantee safety is bullshit! The cable is marked 0.75mm², but this cannot be the case with 315mOhm:




So it is 0.75mm² or not ? Measuring resistance of the cable and calculating resistivity of copper, but what if it is aluminium or iron or other cheaper metal, but still 0.75mm² ?
« Last Edit: April 06, 2023, 03:50:23 pm by modoran »
 

Offline PushUp

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 189
  • Country: de
Re: Low R measurement on a DMM
« Reply #36 on: April 07, 2023, 04:45:46 pm »
As long as the measured values are within its limit, it is fine, which is obviously not the case in my example. Some pat tester such as my already sold "Benning ST 725", gives you even a hint, when you measure PE resistance of a cable (it is the same cable from my desoldering station, as I keep it as a bad example) and you are over 300mOhm (here: 320mOhm, by the way it is the same value as shown by the Fluke 1507): in this case "table" means, that there is something totally wrong...






...and you should check the list of values, as there are no exceptions allowed, when you want to be on the safe side, because 300mOhm is the limit and worst scenario, which means, that you always and forever have to be way under this value and should not pass 150mOhm in the extreme case:






When length and thickness would also give a good value and they are within its limit, the producer will obviously choose the cheapest possible material.

However, as far as my measurements are concerned, most chinese producer even don't pay attention to safety issues and when your house burns down due to overheating, it is your problem, as long as you or your family will survive the fire.

My example and measurements do prove, that this becomes totally normal, so that it is up to you, to check any cable and/or testgear before using it - the safeyt stickers are useless and that is why I wrote in my first post, that anybody should have or at least use a pat tester!


This cable, for instance, was from my first 15 Inch Eizo Monitor and I have never ever seen such a good value of 50mOhm anymore, which underlines my observation...







Cheers!  ;)
 

Offline HighVoltage

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5560
  • Country: de
Re: Low R measurement on a DMM
« Reply #37 on: May 13, 2023, 11:47:18 am »
I have always been using a Gossen Metrawatt Secutest for my VDE 701/702 requirements.

Nice to see some other instruments here for the same purpose.
Thanks for the many pictures.

There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who can count and those who can not.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf