| Products > Test Equipment |
| What's the cheapest 0.02% accuracy handheld meter |
| << < (11/16) > >> |
| CosteC:
--- Quote from: bdunham7 on July 14, 2023, 04:07:20 pm ---CosteC made a good point but just didn't choose the best example to illustrate the issue. --- End quote --- You are welcome :) Lets examine something better than ANENG. Or at least seemingly better. --- Quote from: bdunham7 on July 14, 2023, 04:07:20 pm ---The 869S is a "0.02%" meter, --- End quote --- It is 0.02% meter, Brymen style: at two ranges 0.2%, worse for other 3 ranges: 0.3%, 0.4% and 0.15% for 500-1000 VDC. BM869S has 0.3% +20d on 500.00 mV range. For case mentioned this means 0.5 mV error - 0.5%. Surprisingly it is BEST AC range. 500 VAC range has 0.5% + 40d. At best 45-300 Hz case. Brymen is 0.1% better than Aneng AN870 in this scenario (quite realistic as sub 1 V AC measurements are not so rare) |
| bdunham7:
--- Quote from: miegapele on July 14, 2023, 04:21:39 pm ---You can probably find some random spec where 0.03% Brymen is better than that 289. Does that mean anything? No. --- End quote --- Choosing the meter based on the headline spec doesn't tell you which one is more accurate for a specific case. And if that doesn't mean anything, then what's the point of the whole discussion? |
| Aldo22:
If you work in a restaurant kitchen from freezer to pizza oven, you better use an AN8008. It gives more stable readings over the temperature range than a BM869s says joe smith. https://youtu.be/TSGLA9heboY?t=1768 :-DD |
| alm:
--- Quote from: miegapele on July 14, 2023, 04:21:39 pm ---I disagree here, It's just cherry picking points for distraction. 400A is definitely not common. You can probably find some random spec where 0.03% Brymen is better than that 289. Does that mean anything? No. --- End quote --- If you need the meter for a particular task, like adjusting a trimmer so the voltage between two test points reads 9 V +/- 0.05% with 99% confidence, then yes, it makes a difference if a meter is +/- 0.02% or +/- 0.07% in that range. But another person might me measuring 900V all day. This means the question which of the meters offers the best accuracy might have a different answer for those two people. |
| miegapele:
--- Quote from: alm on July 14, 2023, 10:02:23 pm --- --- Quote from: miegapele on July 14, 2023, 04:21:39 pm ---I disagree here, It's just cherry picking points for distraction. 400A is definitely not common. You can probably find some random spec where 0.03% Brymen is better than that 289. Does that mean anything? No. --- End quote --- If you need the meter for a particular task, like adjusting a trimmer so the voltage between two test points reads 9 V +/- 0.05% with 99% confidence, then yes, it makes a difference if a meter is +/- 0.02% or +/- 0.07% in that range. But another person might me measuring 900V all day. This means the question which of the meters offers the best accuracy might have a different answer for those two people. --- End quote --- Yes, but that's precisely what's cherry picking and distracting is. You can quote millions different scenarios, and some meters will be better suited than others, but I wrote what I need, and that is "cheapest 0.02%" multimeter, so I can sleep calm knowing my AA battery is 1.456V and not some lousy 1.455V. I thought maybe I missed something cheap, but unfortunately such thing does not exist. I guess market is too small :) Obviously it's SOP in here for some to bring FLUKEs every time, although topic clearly states "cheapest", but I guess that's nice for entertainment . |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |