| Products > Test Equipment |
| Which HDMI Microscope Camera and Zoom Lens for soldering |
| << < (6/11) > >> |
| pcprogrammer:
--- Quote from: Phil1977 on August 30, 2024, 08:13:09 am ---Can you tell something about latency? I have one Eakins with a panasonic 1080p sensor that has no perceptible latency at all. Then I worked with a Hayear 4k (with Sony sensor ::) ) setup that was only set to 1080p and latency was not terrible but also not really good. Of course latency has more to do with the image processor than with the sensor manufacturer - but I think it´s one of the key features for a soldering microscope. --- End quote --- I will have to do some tests, but it does not feel to bad. It of course is based on my perception as I do not have tools nor experience in measuring the actual latency. |
| Phil1977:
Does it feel not bad or not perceptible? I´m really quite astonished by the Eakins, I didn't measure it either, but at least I do not feel any delay, movements on the screen look nearly as smooth and instantaneous as with an optical setup. (And it´s sensitivity is more than enough for a microscope. Most of the time the ring-light is not even needed to get good image quality. But I really don't want to discuss this, I'll just ignore further comments on this.) |
| Postal2:
--- Quote from: Phil1977 on August 30, 2024, 08:41:55 am ---....(And it´s sensitivity is more than enough for a microscope. Most of the time the ring-light is not even needed to get good image quality. But I really don't want to discuss this, I'll just ignore further comments on this.) ... --- End quote --- Your reluctance to discuss will not prevent me from commenting. I can also say that my shitty camera has good sensitivity. But I don't want to make fools of anyone. If you want to achieve acceptable depth of field, then the sensitivity is not enough. |
| PlainName:
Just popping it to say I have a pair of HDMI microscope cameras, one auto-focus and one not, one on an optical microscope and one standalone as here, and so far as I can tell the thing that makes the quality good or bad is typically the monitor. My microscope one feeds a small 12" monitor and is not very good - no HDR so gradual transitions of shade don't exist and shadows (or glare) that really aren't that bad turn into black holes (or white ones!). The same make camera feeding a BenQ 22" is much, much better in that respect, and not so much care has to be taken with the lighting. |
| eleguy:
I have been pretty happy with Andonstar AD407. However, if buying now for the same use case I would some likely pick AD409 "Max" in order to get more working distance. The bonus(?) here is that you can solder also without external monitor as these come with screen. This works better for me as I dont have to turn my head while seeing the whole board or the small area that has been zoomed by the microscope. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |