| Products > Test Equipment |
| Yet Another DMM Indecision Post |
| (1/8) > >> |
| KungFuJosh:
I'm considering getting yet another meter. I was hoping to get something higher-end, but not sure what the best option is, especially in the lower price ranges. My primary DMM for the past 12 years has been an Amprobe 37XR-A. It's been great for the most part, and I love that it has inductance in addition to the standards. I also have a dozen other meters including the DE-5000 and the new Shannon tweezers. My primary uses are for electronics work on guitars, amplifiers, pro audio, and some more precise stuff like my FUtracer tube tracer. Generally speaking, I don't need 30 digits, but I do want solid performance. If something is available with common TRMS DMM specs plus inductance, that would be awesome. I guess I want a higher accuracy / broader spec version of the 37XR-A. I always use voltage, diode, impedance & continuity, sometimes current, and capacitance, and sometimes inductance. If trying to get inductance included is unrealistic, that's fine. I'm not trying to spend thousands of dollars on a DMM. I'm not interested in paying for the Fluke name either. These seem to be nice options from the Multimeter chart thread (and the 1000 other threads like this one), but I don't think any do inductance: Brymen BM869 Hioki DT4282 Uni-T UT181A CEM DT-9987 EEVblog / Brymen BM786 Does anybody have a reason why a bench model might be preferred? From my understanding, they typically cost more, take up more space, and aren't isolated because they usually use wall power. I don't really want to spend a lot on this, so I might trade (or sell) my SDG2042X towards a nice meter. It's barely used at all (probably less than an hour total) since I got it shortly before my SDS2104XP, and then only used the built-in AWG. If I get something cheaper like the BM786 I'll just keep it. Thanks, Josh |
| tautech:
--- Quote from: KungFuJosh on May 08, 2023, 11:58:51 pm ---Does anybody have a reason why a bench model might be preferred? From my understanding, they typically cost more, take up more space, and aren't isolated because they usually use wall power. --- End quote --- Of course a bench DMM has isolated terminals, what DMM doesn't ! Isolation from mains is provided within the meter and they typically offer a rating into the reference terminal of 500V max above mains ground. See image: |
| KungFuJosh:
--- Quote from: tautech on May 09, 2023, 12:16:21 am --- --- Quote from: KungFuJosh on May 08, 2023, 11:58:51 pm ---Does anybody have a reason why a bench model might be preferred? From my understanding, they typically cost more, take up more space, and aren't isolated because they usually use wall power. --- End quote --- Of course a bench DMM has isolated terminals, what DMM doesn't ! Isolation from mains is provided within the meter and they typically offer a rating into the reference terminal of 500V max above mains ground. --- End quote --- Oh, that's cool. I read somebody claiming otherwise on this site (I never bothered to research further, Oops). Ok, so the Siglent DMMs can be on the list too. 😉 I didn't see anything for inductance on those either tho. |
| tautech:
--- Quote from: KungFuJosh on May 09, 2023, 12:50:26 am ---I didn't see anything for inductance on those either tho. --- End quote --- Correct. |
| GigaJoe:
and of course, touchscreen |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |