Answers:
1. E4 remains 9fps. This complies with ITAR regulations and there is no public 60fps modification to date. do not buy an E4 expecting that such a modification will be available in the near future.
2. No physical proof of improved thermal resolution, but theories suggest the new 4C span provides the E8 specification of 0.06C.
3. Bad Pixels exist on all consumer grade micro-bolometers. The nominal performance for the sensor used in the Ex series is 99.8% operational pixels. Bad pixel maps from tested E4's show that most (all?) meet this specification. Some are very good indeed, with very few dead pixels. There may be 'on test' selection by FLIR for the E6/E8 but this has not been Proven to date. No weirdness has been seen on the E4 to support its sensor not working normally and within spec at 320x240.
4. I am a user of thermal imaging cameras in industrial environs and can assure you that the E4 is good value at 80x60 for $1000 and a total bargain at 320x240 for the same money. Do not get hung up on the frame rate unless you want fast action observation. As a thermal CAMERA it is excellent. It cannot record moving images internally (at the moment) so any thermal CAMCORDER type of activity will require an external recorder that works with Web Cams. No composite video is available on the Ex series.
5. The performance of the MSX visible image edge fusion is superb !
6. See this thread for more useful information on the E4 and its use:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/flir-e4-the-useful-information-thread/Hope this helps