This is the first time I've seen a thermal imager with a microbolometer of this resolution for such a low price.
https://hti-instrument.com/collections/thermal-monocular/products/ht-a11-outdoor-thermal-monocular?variant=40630429188211At first I thought it might be one of those scam ones claiming too high of a resolution (the state the resolution of the display screen not the actual microbolometer resolution), especially since it's from a Chinese company. But on further looking they separately state the screen size as 1024x768, so the 640x512 actually is the microbolometer resolution on this one! Also it has a fast frame rate of 50fps, so it definitely has some impressive specs. I haven't bought it yet, but I've been very impressed with HTI's other offerings. I bought their HT-301 cellphone addon USB-C thermal imager before, and it outperformed the Seek Compact Pro not only in slightly higher resolution (384x288 instead of 320x240) and not only in frame rate (25fps instead of 15fps), but also the quality of the image (things like noise and sharpness) were also better than with the Seek Compact Pro.
I also noticed they use a different sensor material for this than the standard vanadium oxide. Instead they use something called amorphous silicon. I bet that would explain the lower price, as working with amorphous silicon for the sensors can probably be done with more commonly available machinery at their factory (probably the same machinery that would be used for etching silicon for normal ICs) instead of specialized machinery for processing the vanadium oxide into sensors. Also the vanadium oxide is probably a rare/exotic and therefore expensive material for them to even get access to, while silicon is a much more widely available and lower priced material.
While I would consider getting this at some point, it's still $1299 which isn't exactly cheap (for this kind of device it sure is, but as an absolute dollar amount it's not at all cheap), and right now I'm saving up for something else (an unrelated device, a Picoscope 5000). But I would certainly consider buying this thermal imager in the future, so I'd like any advice from anybody has here who already has this thermal monocular scope. How good a quality are the images it produces? Would you recommend it for a hobbyist looking for a low-cost 640x480-class thermal imager? Or would you recommend holding off until another company makes a better quality one?