| Products > Thermal Imaging |
| SEEK vs Flir One G2 Images |
| (1/14) > >> |
| havaloc:
I didn't want to post these in the long Flir or Seek threads, but here are some images of the same things from both a Seek Thermal and Flir One G2. Enjoy! 6 and 7, the order is reversed. |
| havaloc:
Some more... |
| havaloc:
Last ones... |
| havaloc:
2 and 3 - ceiling wall corner temperature difference 4 and 5 - timer and GFCI outlet 7 and 6 - stove, warm electronics powering clock 8 and 9 - eneloop charger 11 and 10 - heat vent next to fireplace 13 and 12 - another wall corner temperature difference 15 and 14 - ceiling fan remote receiver is warm 0 and 1 - water under floor? General comments - Even when I 'disabled' MSX on the Flir, it was definitely more temperature sensitive and could pick up much more subtle temperature differences. I disabled it by putting my finger in front of the lens. The Flir does the calibration shutter click every 20-30 seconds, while the Seek does so every 3-5 seconds. The Flir lasts about 45 minutes on battery, so not much, but enough. While it looks like I might have cherry picked examples, in general, I could not find an instance where the Seek did better. Yes, the MSX is definitely an advantage to the Flir, but I see no reason not to use it since it's there. At the same price, it's hard to go with the Seek. I do credit Seek however, with starting a competition with Flir, causing all of us to benefit. One last Flir advantage, it works with Flir tools and the images also include a visual image you can slide up and down. These images are both from the iOS version. |
| -jeffB:
Wow -- it seems like I got much better results than that from my (Android, original version) SeeK. I was all excited to be getting a new phone that's directly compatible with the SeeK, but now my SeeK dongle has gone missing. :( So, no counterexamples from my end just yet... |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |