Author Topic: TG165 vs TG167  (Read 1528 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline targit

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 33
  • Country: au
TG165 vs TG167
« on: August 17, 2018, 03:50:49 pm »
Hi, I have yet to see either of these in the flesh, not sure I understand the big(ish) price difference, but the TG167 seems more suitable for Auto-electrical fault finding. I am using my hacked E30 at the moment, but its more suited to indoor close up pcb work than outdoor / garage use.
Has anyone been able to compare them side by side? Is the smaller FOV worth the approx. AU$200 price difference?
Thanks.
 

Offline Dianyang

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 17
  • Country: cn
Re: TG165 vs TG167
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2018, 01:55:12 am »
TG165 is 50 degree FOV and TG167 is 25 degree FOV, since FLIR Lepton 2.0 is only 80*60 pixel resolution, with a narrow FOV to see long range will not catch the detail of the objects.
 

Offline Gyro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4255
  • Country: gb
Re: TG165 vs TG167
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2018, 05:38:21 am »
If you're really satisfied with Lepton 2 80*60 then the TG130 would be your cheapest option...

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/thermal-imaging/flir-tg130-review/msg1386737/#msg1386737
Chris

"Victor Meldrew, the Crimson Avenger!"
 

Offline Dianyang

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 17
  • Country: cn
Re: TG165 vs TG167
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2018, 12:06:31 pm »
In my opinion, TG135 is cost effective than TG130, since TG135 has a high and low temp tracing feature. With a 80*60 resolution, it is hard to aim the target.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf